BMC AMI DevX vs. Enov8 Release Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BMC AMI DevX
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
BMC AMI DevX is an integrated software platform that provides mainframe development teams with modern Application Development and DevOps capabilities. The solution connects traditional mainframe environments with contemporary development practices through components for source code management, testing, debugging, and analytics.N/A
Enov8 Release Manager
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
A solution to streamline delivery of IT change through embracing “Scaled Agile” best practice. Based on the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe), The Enov8 ERM platform centrally governs all enterprise releases and deployments.N/A
Pricing
BMC AMI DevXEnov8 Release Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BMC AMI DevXEnov8 Release Manager
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BMC AMI DevXEnov8 Release Manager
Considered Both Products
BMC AMI DevX
Chose BMC AMI DevX
As per the overall dev team, most of the team has previoulsy used Devx and were satisfy with the results
Chose BMC AMI DevX
Power bi also gives all the data information about the mainframe server but it does rights codes or debugs the files. Both has other features and I think both does job in their own individual way.
Chose BMC AMI DevX
we used to use Compuware Strobe extensively to monitor performance
Chose BMC AMI DevX
We chose BMC because we already had tools from the BMC range on our development platforms and overall they are good tools.
Chose BMC AMI DevX
BMC AMI DevX wins by 33 lengths!
Chose BMC AMI DevX
The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. …
Chose BMC AMI DevX
Optim is more user friendly in how it operates, in my opinion. It's less obtuse to figure out how to extract and mask the data required compared to File-AID. Further, Optim is easier to gather related tables, by far. I do prefer using File-AID via the Topaz GUI much more than …
Enov8 Release Manager

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
BMC AMI DevXEnov8 Release Manager
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BMC AMI DevXEnov8 Release Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BMC AMI DevXEnov8 Release Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
I love these tools! However, my company has not yet transitioned from SCLM to a modern repository, and this is causing most of our developers to remain within TSO for all their development. It's been a slow adoption up to this point, but we are moving toward more modernization this year and next, so with any luck, we'll see usage pick up. Success depends on the speed at which your management is willing to move.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Code Pipeline: integration of MF and non-MF type of object (COBOL, Java, zosconnect...). Deployment of objects coming from inside and outside the mainframe in the same way.
  • Workbench for Eclipse: a must-have for working with Code Pipeline and the mainframe in the development context.
  • Workbench for VS Code: They started developing VSCode, and the plugin works very well. There are a lot of things to add, but it's still very good. Young developers like it!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Download source code plug-in on Azure DevOps to allow downloading prod version even if it's not in the assignment.
  • Publishing Test Results on Azure DevOps from Total Test plugin
  • Integration with DevEnterprise in Workbench and GenAI capabilities for enhance code analysis (Accross multiple programs/applications)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
This is a very good range of tools that we use daily to maintain our programs
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
9 as it gives good smooth experience for all development tasks. Can be improved a little.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
The tool is very reliable and we have had very few cases where we have had to contact support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
With one exception, we did not observe any slowdown in development activity when using the AMI DEVX Code DEBug tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support has been amazing compared to Optim. Further, new features are very regular with File-AID - I can't remember the last time Optim had a significant update. File-AID support is very receptive to feature requests and reported bugs, including sending out hotfixes quickly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The learning phase is relatively easy to implement.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The installation teams for these products have never complained about any difficulties during the integration of this range of tools into our IT system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. All of them had their advantages and disadvantages. Code Pipeline, however, stands head and shoulders above the rest in simplicity, completeness, effectiveness, efficiency, and elegance.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • I can debug (expeditor) much faster and more efficiently. In fact, I was asked yesterday to run their job through Workbench Expeditor. I can also view data movement much better.
  • Code analysis lets me give a quicker explanation of what a program may do, as it provides a graphical interface showing processing and data movement.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

BMC AMI DevX Screenshots

Screenshot of BMC AMI DevX Workbench for VS CodeScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code Insights ft BMC AMI Assistant in Visual StudioScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code Insights ft Runtime VisualizerScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code PipelineScreenshot of BMC AMI zAdviser Enterprise