BrandShield Anti-Phishing vs. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BrandShield Anti-Phishing | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | BrandShield Anti-Phishing provides a complete online threat map, by monitoring the Internet including social media to detect phishing sites and pages, impersonation and online fraud. Its takedown services are viewable at any time from the system’s Threat Dashboard. | N/A |
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps organizations efficiently detect, mitigate and respond to known and unknown advanced threats that target people and VIPs through email. TAP provides unparalleled effectiveness in stopping targeted attacks that use polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and credential-stealing phishing techniques to obtain sensitive information. TAP seamlessly integrates with the Proofpoint secure email gateway (Proofpoint Email Protection) to deliver best… | N/A |
| BrandShield Anti-Phishing | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| BrandShield Anti-Phishing | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| BrandShield Anti-Phishing | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| BrandShield Anti-Phishing | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 5.3 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.9 |
| BrandShield Anti-Phishing | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |

