Likelihood to Recommend Overall BrightHire has a really nice UI and is very simple to use. It is also quite fast. It appears as "Notetaker" for your company during the interview. However I am unsure of its capabilities (at this time) to very accurately capture transcripts in languages that are not English (it could be but I cannot attest to it right now). Its ability to capture technical jargon is not perfect. I would recommend using BrightHire when you you are conducting non technical interviews at this time
Read full review I always recommend this product to companies of all sizes who are looking for a reliable way to add virtual interviewing to their assessment strategy. There are 50+ vendors in this space right now but none of them have been around as long as InterviewStream. Their product is especially good for high volume scenarios but we've used it for all levels from executives down to hourly employees. We even used it internally for succession planning interviews and internal mobility
Read full review Pros Identifying the percentage of time the candidate/interviewer speaks during the interview Captures accurate transcript (in english) of the interview Allows to fill out scorecards very fast Read full review Simple interface. It's not a flashy product with claims of artificial intelligence or machine learning, etc. It just gets the job done for a fair price. Reliable. While we have had some minor issues from time-to-time with live interviews, the recorded interviews have worked fine in several countries around the world. Support. Our customer success person was always available and helpful. Read full review Cons Capturing transcripts acurrately in languages other than english Accuracy of the AI notes generated by BrightHire as key points is not the best (the tool skews the findings a bit) Read full review Reporting could be better. Would love to see more stats around where our users are dropping off, invited vs. completed metrics and ROI numbers as well. A better database of technical interview questions. Read full review Alternatives Considered We looked at several video interview companies when we made a purchase decision. With the exception of
HireVue , they're all about the same. We just went with InterviewStream because they had the most experience in the industry and their pricing was fair.
HireVue is a premium product who tries to distance themselves from the video interview space by claiming that they are a collaboration/training tool or an AI assessment tool. They're wayyyy overpriced for what they offer if you just want video interviewing. And their sales process is high pressure and a little bit slimy to be honest. If you need a proven tool that has been around, InterviewStream is good.
Read full review Return on Investment Saving time in filling out scorecards Accuracy of the interview transcripts, which reduces any potential bias Read full review We took a 7 step interview process in one of our high volume areas down to 3 steps. This saved 2 weeks in time to hire and increased our conversion rate with top candidates by 20% (presumably because we moved faster). We saved $100,000 minimum in travel expenses in the first year. We don't know the exact amount because much of these costs are hidden in the business, but we could track at least $100k in hard costs. Negatively, I'd say we lost a little bit of street credibility on sites like glassdoor where people would vent that they didn't like recorded video interviews. Over time that feedback dwindled as this strategy has been adopted by more companies. Read full review ScreenShots