Brinqa vs. Cisco Vulnerability Management

Brinqa

Cisco Vulnerability Management

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Brinqa	Score 9.0 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Brinqa Risk Analytics is a governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) management platform from Brinqa headquartered in Austin, Texas.	N/A
Cisco Vulnerability Management	Score 8.4 out of 10	N/A	Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM by Kenna Security, which was acquired by Cisco in June of 2021), is a vulnerability management platform featuring real-time cyber-risk analysis and predictive modeling based on intelligence feeds and global attack telemetries to provide accurate, reliable risk prioritization and protection.	N/A

Pricing

Brinqa

Cisco Vulnerability Management

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Brinqa	Cisco Vulnerability Management
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Required

No setup fee

Additional Details

Pricing is based on use case and number of seats/users.

—

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Features

Brinqa

Cisco Vulnerability Management

Threat Intelligence

Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
	Brinqa - Ratings	Cisco Vulnerability Management 8.7 2 Ratings 8% above category average
Network Analytics	00 Ratings	7.31 Ratings
Threat Recognition	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification	00 Ratings	9.32 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting	00 Ratings	7.22 Ratings
Threat Analysis	00 Ratings	7.22 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings

Vulnerability Management Tools

Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
	Brinqa - Ratings	Cisco Vulnerability Management 9.3 2 Ratings 11% above category average
IT Asset Realization	00 Ratings	9.32 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring	00 Ratings	9.32 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence	00 Ratings	9.32 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Brinqa	Cisco Vulnerability Management
Small Businesses	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Brinqa	Cisco Vulnerability Management
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Brinqa	Cisco Vulnerability Management
Likelihood to Recommend	Brinqa No answers on this topic	Cisco It works well when interfacing with Qualys VM QualysGuard to highlight server vulnerabilities, providing details on the affected packages and programs, along with solutions and links to the provider's websites, so our servers can be kept safe by quickly addressing issues. Because vulnerability scores are assigned, we can prioritize which servers to address first. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Brinqa No answers on this topic	Cisco Vulnerability tracking Risk Meter reporting to pinpoint specific systems or vulnerabilities Provides vulnerability scores to see what is high / medium / low urgency Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Brinqa No answers on this topic	Cisco The layout of the information could use some improvement. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Brinqa No answers on this topic	Cisco CVM provides a very easy to understand and use interfaces. Dashboards and reporting are compiled nicely when risk meters are created. After initial setup of software cisco onboarding teams do an amazing job going over all areas of this software to provide best overall usability of the product. Against other tools setup and usability is at a higher standard Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Brinqa No answers on this topic	Cisco We run a flavor of multiple products and CVM enhances/complements those tools by pinpointing where the vulnerabilities are at on our network. Intune and Automox being products CVM works well with when its time to patch affected systems. Tenable we used prior to CVM and its product was too complex and clunky and always had issues with asset duplication. CVM simplified vulnerability scanning and made it a lot easier to manage compared to Tenable Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Brinqa No answers on this topic	Cisco Has kept our company safe from exploits. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Brinqa Screenshots