Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Forescout Vistaro Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Manager, formerly from CA Technologies, is a unified tool for systems monitoring and analytics. It offers multiple deployment options for IT teams and MSPs .N/A
Forescout Vistaro Platform
Score 6.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Forescout Technologies headquartered in San Jose actively defends the Enterprise of Things by identifying, segmenting and enforcing compliance of every connected thing. Forescout boasts a widely deployed, enterprise-class platform at scale across IT, IoT, and OT managed and unmanaged devices. Forescout arms customers with device intelligence, in order to allow organizations across every industry to classify risk, detect anomalies and quickly remediate cyberthreats without disruption of critical…N/A
Pricing
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementForescout Vistaro Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementForescout Vistaro Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementForescout Vistaro Platform
Considered Both Products
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Chose Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure Management gives you an extremely easy implementation facility whether it is the core application, reporting hubs, or agents. Apart from that, it has extremely good customer support. The documentation with respect to each component is really …
Chose Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
CA UIM is a perfect replacement for NSM and eHealth. Provides more options and continued support from the vendor.
Chose Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Cost models: servers vs component
CA uses more of a server/device model where SolarWinds uses more of a component model.
I prefer CA's model better for large MSP types; SolarWinds is better priced for Non-MSP shops.
Chose Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Basically, these other tools were easy to setup, I think sometimes even more that Nimsoft in some scenarios. But after you need to expand the size of the environment, or in big environments, for me, Nimsoft is the tool that allows you to grow with them. All of the other tools …
Chose Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure Management
All tools have their own gaps , some seem to do more than others, some just work better. With UIM we have found a sweet spot with features, price point, pros, cons, etc.
Forescout Vistaro Platform
Chose Forescout Vistaro Platform
It was able to relieve us of some of the duties performed by the operations team as it made it easy to do those tasks. It allows us to view devices that are connected to our network and segregate those that are not company owned and also account for guests' logins as are signed …
Chose Forescout Vistaro Platform
Better intergration with patch management tools. Forescount Platfform (CounterAct) is easily compatible with diverse network infrastructure to offer better service and efficiently ensure seamless operations. Its automation capabilities have also enabled us to depend less on the …
Chose Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout Platform (CounterACT) is capable to perform intelligent device classifications which able to group and segmentize the assets effectively. Besides, the classification techniques can be customized according to the organization requirements. With agentless deployment, …
Chose Forescout Vistaro Platform
When I got here, they already had this product in place, so I was not part of the final decision, but after using this for a couple of years, I can say that it was an intelligent decision for the business!!
Chose Forescout Vistaro Platform
Heterogeneous compatibility with switches and other network infrastructure setup is a major advantage. There are many companies where there is a legacy network combined with different OEM deployed. Integration of network devices like switches, FW, routers, AP's gives complete …
Chose Forescout Vistaro Platform
We selected CounterACT because it didn't require 802.1x and it didn't require any switch upgrades. To use 802.1x we would have to assume all endpoints are guilty until proven innocent. With CounterACT we can detect quickly if endpoints are not compliant and remediate without …
Chose Forescout Vistaro Platform
CounterACT was the product that was able to do exactly what we were looking to accomplish and that was to block non-company owned devices from connecting to our network based on our criteria. It will allow us to decide if a blocked device should be allowed on our network …
Best Alternatives
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementForescout Vistaro Platform
Small Businesses
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Score 7.7 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementForescout Vistaro Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Broadcom DX Unified Infrastructure ManagementForescout Vistaro Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
I've been really happy with the amount of performance data and reporting options that I've been able to get out of UIM. Performance hardware statistics take no more than a few mouse clicks. Also, as mentioned in the pros section, deployment and configuration is very intuitive and easy.
Read full review
I strongly recommend using it in networks where many machines enter, it is essential to have a capture of all ids, mac etc to prevent and detect unauthorized machines.We are in the technological era and there is a lot of technological robotization looking for weak systems to enter.Invest in greater security and that does not happen to you.
Read full review
Pros
  • Server performance can be done exceptionally well with UIM. It monitors various OS flavors: POSIX (Aix, HPUX, Linux, Solaris, zLinux), and Windows.
  • With just a handful of probe s(CDM, NTevl, NTservices, NTperf, processes, logmon) your dashboards can be populated within minutes after installation of the product and discovering servers. One particular feature I like is MCS which allows you to perform template based monitoring which allows for implementing standards and including exceptions.
  • The SNMP collector monitors anything that is SNMP capable. With the ability to build a template out of templates here as well, you can standardize monitoring by device, vendor, or model regardless of device type: routers, switches, storage, load balancers, etc.
  • The UMP is the presentation layer. Without OOTB dashboards, you see quickly how your environment is performing. And with true multi-tenancy, you can separate data by customer.
Read full review
  • Great in monitoring what applications versions are running and on what devices.
  • Good identification of unmanaged devices and segregating them.
  • Endpoint visibility.
Read full review
Cons
  • The use of flash in Dashboards
  • Integration with more alert options (Slack, for example), out of the box
  • Fast deploy also in the mainstream Linux Distros.
Read full review
  • Grow the Forescout community to help in addressing concern for a larger audience via channels
  • More training and demos for latest FS versions released
  • GUI can be made more interactive and aesthetic in appearance
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Meets our business requirements
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Easy to configure and use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Exceed Expectations.
Read full review
They are prompt in their response with a complete resolution once they have identified the problem. Other OEM's generally give stop-gap arrangements and then later come with new upgrade versions. This gives downtime tasks to customers often, which isn't appreciated. Given the criticality of this software, their support is prompt.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Plan it out based on your requirements.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Basically, these other tools were easy to setup, I think sometimes even more that Nimsoft in some scenarios. But after you need to expand the size of the environment, or in big environments, for me, Nimsoft is the tool that allows you to grow with them. All of the other tools start to present problems in the database. When you need to think in bigger machines or start to "code inside the tool" to solve some performance problems, and other problems that appear. Nimsoft comes with a big set of documentation, and the support really works, as fast as you need, even as higher as you pay.
Read full review
CounterACT was the product that was able to do exactly what we were looking to accomplish and that was to block non-company owned devices from connecting to our network based on our criteria. It will allow us to decide if a blocked device should be allowed on our network temporarily
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Low cost of ownership allows us to pass along the savings to our clients
  • As an MSP we are delivering support to our clients with a tool that does not add much to their monthly contract costs
Read full review
  • We have been able to achieve deeper levels of security.
  • It has been able to counter most threats through the detection of rogue devices and segregating them.
  • Fostered accountability as guests' devices is signed in by employees so as to track activities they may be undertaking.
Read full review
ScreenShots