BugTracker.net vs. Original Software TestAssist

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BugTracker.net
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Original Software TestAssist
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
A tool that manages the software delivery life cycle process and provides instant access to a unified view of all IT projects from any device. Qualify comes with data stores, workflows, dashboards, and reporting.N/A
Pricing
BugTracker.netOriginal Software TestAssist
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BugTracker.netOriginal Software TestAssist
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BugTracker.netOriginal Software TestAssist
Best Alternatives
BugTracker.netOriginal Software TestAssist
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BugTracker.netOriginal Software TestAssist
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BugTracker.netOriginal Software TestAssist
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
See above. Recommended questions: What type of feedback or tracking will we be doing? Will this need to be client-facing? How will we track content edits? How many users will be assigned to issues in a given project?
Read full review
Original Software
No answers on this topic
Pros
Open Source
  • Ability to split our multiple projects and assign a user base.
  • Ability to set permissions based on user base/ roles.
  • Customization of fields on a project level.
Read full review
Original Software
No answers on this topic
Cons
Open Source
  • User interface for client-facing feedback
  • Content and design updates tracking
Read full review
Original Software
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
I would plan on renewing and staying with BugTracker.net simply because it is a no nonsense easy to use tool. Once you get it set up and understand the small nuances with this custom piece of software, it really is a great tool to help your organization get started with Defect Management and BugTracking without having to drop several thousands of dollars on tools that are more fluff than function.
Read full review
Original Software
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.
Read full review
Original Software
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
  • Smoother builder deploys
  • Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team
Read full review
Original Software
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots