A talent experience and self-service solution that combines automation and AI, multi-channel engagement, and self-service capabilities, a solution by Bullhorn to elevates a brand and its service offering, drive redeployment, and bring down the cost of talent acquisition.
N/A
CEIPAL WorkForce
Score6.3 out of 10
N/A
Ceipal enables users to integrate and manage the talent acquisition lifecycle, to simplify, scale, and transform any high-growth business into a diverse talent powerhouse. Ceipal serves over 2,500+ customers and 120,000 recruiters globally.
N/A
Pricing
Bullhorn Talent Platform
CEIPAL WorkForce
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bullhorn Talent Platform
CEIPAL WorkForce
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
5% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Features
Bullhorn Talent Platform
CEIPAL WorkForce
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.7
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.9
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
8.0
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.4
1 Ratings
11% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
8.0
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.7
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
9.0
1 Ratings
11% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
9.0
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
7.8
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Feature
Bullhorn Talent Platform
-
Ratings
CEIPAL WorkForce
8.3
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Bullhorn Talent Platform and CEIPAL WorkForce
Bullhorn seems like a really great tool for recruiters. I like the search functionality. It made my job a thousand times easier. Of course, the search doesn't mean much if you don't record as many details as possible for each of your candidates. Seems like it could work well for a large company with lots of recruiters but probably wouldn't be great for a small operation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The Functionality and Quality of this software package are nice. the help and force support from this software package and therefore the CEIPAL force team helped to unravel the problems two-faced by the shoppers. Initially it absolutely was troublesome on behalf of me to use this software. As there were terribly minute problems with the layers of the things within Ceipal.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We chose BOND because it had the capacity to handle large amounts of data and because we needed the advanced reporting function. Ultimately, the recruiting functionality was limited compared to other, similar systems - particularly in the integration with Office 365, social media, and MSP sites. We ended up deciding to end our contract with BOND in favor of one which served our recruiting needs better.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
CEIPAL force over straightforward Cloud HR application with functions like immigration accounts receivable and integrations available. Simple configuration to line up the corporate, workflow and aboard staff makes it likable. A Low & versatile rating backed by support from real individuals makes it enticing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info