Candid GuideStar vs. Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Candid GuideStar
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GuideStar by Candid offers GuideStar Pro for updated nonprofit data for research and other purposes, supporting data matching and validation, mailing list creation and generation, grant writing and eligibility validation, and integration of nonprofit data into existing customer or outreach data sets.N/A
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
The vendor states that Informatica Data Quality empowers companies to take a holistic approach to managing data quality across the entire organization, and that with Informatica Data Quality, users are able to ensure the success of data-driven digital transformation initiatives and projects across users, types, and scale, while also automating mission-critical tasks.N/A
Pricing
Candid GuideStarInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Candid GuideStarInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Candid GuideStarInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Features
Candid GuideStarInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Data Quality
Comparison of Data Quality features of Product A and Product B
Candid GuideStar
-
Ratings
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
8.6
5 Ratings
1% above category average
Data source connectivity00 Ratings9.15 Ratings
Data profiling00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Master data management (MDM) integration00 Ratings8.65 Ratings
Data element standardization00 Ratings7.75 Ratings
Match and merge00 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Address verification00 Ratings8.85 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Candid GuideStarInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

HubSpot Operations Hub
HubSpot Operations Hub
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Score 6.6 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Candid GuideStarInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(3 ratings)
9.0
(20 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(14 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Candid GuideStarInformatica Cloud Data Quality
Likelihood to Recommend
Candid.org
It is just my go-to for any information I need on a potential client as I work in the non-profit consulting space and need to better understand my prospects. As a former nonprofit exec, I valued what we could share on the site as a gold seal for others to learn about our worthiness to invest.
Read full review
Informatica
For effective data collaboration, systematic verification of customer information, and address, among others, Informatica Data Quality is a fruitful application to consider. Besides, Informatica Data Quality controls quality through a cleansing process, giving the company a professional outline of candid data profiling and reputable analytics. Finally, Informatica Data Quality allows the simplistic navigation of content, with a dashboard that supports predictability.
Read full review
Pros
Candid.org
  • Identifying information from funder 990s
  • Gives credence to transparency claims
Read full review
Informatica
  • The matching algorithms in IDQ are very powerful if you understand the different types that they offer (e.g., Hamming Distance, Jaro, Bigram, etc..). We had to play around with it to see which best suit our own needs of identifying and eliminating duplicate customers. Setting up the whole process (e.g., creating the KeyGenerator Transformation, setting up the matching threshold, etc..) can be somewhat time consuming and a challenge if you don't first standardize your data.
  • The integration with PowerCenter is great if you have both. You can either import your mappings directly to PowerCenter or to an XML file. The only downside is that some of the transformations are unique to IDQ, so you are not really able to edit them once in PowerCenter.
  • The standardizer transformation was key in helping us standardize our customer data (e.g., names, addresses, etc..). It was helpful due to having create a reference table containing the standardized value and the associated unstandardized values. What was great was that if you used Informatica Analyst, a business analyst could login and correct any of the values.
Read full review
Cons
Candid.org
  • Most 990s are typically a few years behind.
  • Organization profiles are only as complete as the organization makes them.
Read full review
Informatica
  • Several partnerships diminishing the value of technologies
  • Unable to get list of objects from Repository (like sources & targets) that don't have any dependency
  • Scheduling: The built-in scheduling tool has many constraints such as handling Unix/VB scripts etc. Most enterprises use third party tools for this.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Candid.org
No answers on this topic
Informatica
As pointed out earlier, due all the robust features IDQ has, our use f the product is successful and stable. IDQ is being used in multiple sources (from CRM application and in batch mode). As this is an iterative process, we are looking to improve our system efficiency using IDQ.
Read full review
Usability
Candid.org
No answers on this topic
Informatica
Easy to use not only for developers but also business users
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Candid.org
No answers on this topic
Informatica
The application works well except an occasional error out while using the system. It usually gets fixed when restarting the Infa server
Read full review
Performance
Candid.org
No answers on this topic
Informatica
Performance works just fine. It was able to load 200+ business terms, 150+ DQ automation, etc. very well.
Read full review
Support Rating
Candid.org
Any support I've ever had to get from them was quick and professional. Their online guides/help docs are also easy to read.
Read full review
Informatica
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Candid.org
I have always used Guidestar as my go-to not only when I was a non-profit executive and wanted to ensure we remained worthy of their rating but also now as a non-profit consultant where I need to understand my current and potential partners across financials, key contacts, board members, etc.
Read full review
Informatica
Has a suite of applications and components that we can integrate with Informatica Power center to deliver enterprise-strength data quality capabilities in a wide range of scenarios. Provides comprehensive and modular support for all data and all use cases whether in small or complex projects. Streamlined data discovery with a broad and deep lineup of enterprises.
Read full review
Scalability
Candid.org
No answers on this topic
Informatica
Scalability works as expected and it is truly an enterprise system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Candid.org
  • More informed grant proposals.
  • Able to easily and efficiently complete grant research.
Read full review
Informatica
  • Integration with tools like PowerCenter helped faster delivery of product, and at the same time conversion
  • Reduce overall project cost due to bad data , bad quality, exceptions identified nearing go-live and post production
  • Employee efficiency is increased exponentially due to more automated, customized tool
Read full review
ScreenShots