TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CanIRank

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ACanIRank is SEO software.  The vendor’s stated value proposition is that by collecting data and metrics from other SEO services and then adding a layer of machine learning intelligence, users are delivered actionable insights, opportunities and personalized recommendations. Additionally, the vendor says their goal is to help users spend less time collecting and analyzing data and more time making improvements in order to grow traffic.N/A

    OpenText Optimost

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AOpenText Optimost is designed to help companies deliver engaging, profitable websites and campaigns and includes self-service capabilities. Optimost also provides white glove consulting to help companies test confidently when the stakes and complexity are highest; immediately when speed is of the essence, and to match the perfect content to every customer.N/A
    Pricing
    CanIRankOpenText Optimost
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CanIRankOpenText Optimost
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CanIRankOpenText Optimost
    SEO
    Comparison of SEO features of CanIRank and OpenText Optimost
    Feature
    CanIRank
    9.1
    1 Ratings
    17% above category average
    OpenText Optimost
    -
    Ratings
    Keyword analysis9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    Backlink management9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    SERP ranking tracking9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    Page grader9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    Competitive analysis9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    Site audit / diagnostics9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    Site recommendations9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    Task management9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CanIRankOpenText Optimost
    Small Businesses
    Serpstat
    Score10 out of 10
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Yoast
    Score8.5 out of 10
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Trends
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CanIRankOpenText Optimost
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CanIRankOpenText Optimost
    Likelihood to Recommend
    CanIRank
    I think CanIRank is great for any business that wants to improve its Search Engine Optimize, get more traffic, and create a healthier website and user experience. If you're feeling stagnant with your traffic growth or need help getting more visibility, they can help. I'd note that this is for businesses that are making money or that have expendable cashflow, as, while it is a great value, it also isn't cheap.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    The ease of implementation combined with the managed services result in a tool that virtually anyone can use - implementation is less than 10 lines of code added to the relevant pages of the website (we simply added it to our master page template to have it available on any page) and from there the customer can be as involved or not involved as they wish. At BSI we are very hands on with the testing programme - usually developing and designing the tests ourselves and having HP build them, but if we wanted to HP to develop, design and build and limit our role to QA and review that is an option.
    Read full review
    Pros
    CanIRank
    • Their team keeps our project workflows extremely organized.
    • Their tool + consulting service is a great value for what you get.
    • They help you pinpoint specific goals and actually attain them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Because it is a managed service the need for intervention by our internal IT group was removed. This allowed us to control the pace of the testing programme without being influenced by IT resource allocation
    • The client and technical account managers are very good at suggesting tests or potential improvements
    • HP regularly holds custom forums which are always informative and provide an opportunity to learn from and network with peers and industry leaders
    Read full review
    Cons
    CanIRank
    • I have no complaints! I really enjoy their services and have seen improvement in my business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The dashboard interface is difficult to navigate, but I understand that they are currently developing/testing a new much more user friendly interface
    • The cost can be a barrier for some organisations, but for us it is worth it. Also they are in the process of releasing a less expensive self authoring testing tool.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    CanIRank
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    We have not only renewed our subscription three years running, but we have added the self authoring tool and are looking to expand the subscription so that we can take advantage of the managed services on a global level.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    CanIRank
    Their team is helping me to improve my website SEO, traffic, and user experience. We've already gotten a number of pages/posts to rank on Page #1 of Google, and have helped me to address a number of backend issues, including site speed. I love having a knowledgeable team helping me to reach my goals, especially since I don't particularly like doing the technical side of things!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    CanIRank
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    We evaluated Optimost again Adobe's similar offering (Target). The big difference between the two and the reason why BSI choose Autonomy was the managed service aspect. The idea that once the code was deployed on the site IT no longer had to be involved gave my team full ownership of the testing programme. With the Adobe product, the involvement of the internal IT group would have been required to launch each test - and this would have decreased the number of tests we could run each month. Back in the day I also used offermatica/omniture and this too required IT involvement.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    CanIRank
    • They've helped me get a number of posts/pages onto page #1 of Google.
    • Increased website speed.
    • Helped me fix dead-end pages to keep visitors on my site.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Use HP Optimost was the primary driver behind a 40% increase in UK classroom training courses booked online read more details here: http://www.autonomy.com/work/news/details/hsx6767d
    • HP Optimost testing led to a 9% increase in sales by improving the BSI Shop's checkout funnel in 2012
    • HP Optimost is integral to the success of BSI's continuous improvement testing programme
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    CanIRank Screenshots

    Product screenshotScreenshot of Compare yourself to the competition