CareerSiteBuilder vs. Simplicant

If you have a job opening or a high turn around rate like we do. (we are a staffing company) [CareerSiteBuilder] is a great place to to start. It is affordable and reaches hundreds of potential employees. When you search resumes sometimes when you enter keywords you have to play around with it to find the right phrasing. Its not difficult just time consuming.

Incentivized

- Best for mass hiring - Best for opening multiple positions

Incentivized

• Search features.
• Quantity of resumes.
• The format that the candidates information is presented.

Incentivized

• The job posting is very elaborative.
• Have the best option of posting jobs directly to LinkedIn, Indeed, etc.
• The filter options are great, they do wonders in-terms of shortlisting.

Incentivized

• There are some missing functionalities that could be addressed such as fusing resume search and recruitment edge.

Incentivized

• The scheduling process through Simplicant can be made better.
• Sometimes Simplicant is unable to parse a profile, that needs attention.

Incentivized

Affordable, quick, easy, super user friendly, well known, offers a large variety of job seekers[.]

Incentivized

• We have been able to present MORE candidates to our clients in the staffing industry, and therefore fill more positions.
• We are able to find MORE QUALIFIED candidates using search features, to in turn fill more direct-hire positions.
• We have to pay or Career Builder for thousands of people, so that takes away from ROI.

Incentivized

• Increased efficiency of our recruitment
• Better tracking of candidates

Incentivized