Causal vs. Cube

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Causal
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Causal, from the company of the same name in London, presents a way to perform calculations, visualise data, and communicate with numbers. It helps build models faster, connect them directly to data, and share them with interactive dashboards and visuals. Suggested use cases are financial planning, planning CPC campaigns, track KPIs, or determine employee compensation.
$50
per month
Cube
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cube is a financial planning & analysis (FP&A) platform that aims to enable finance teams to be more strategic and positively contribute to company growth activities by spending less time on manual, repetitive task, from Cube Planning headquartered in New York.
$1,500
per month
Pricing
CausalCube
Editions & Modules
Pro
$50
per user, per month
Business
Contact Sales
Cube Go
$1,500
per month
Cube Pro
$2,800
per month
Enterprise
Contact us
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CausalCube
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CausalCube
Considered Both Products
Causal

No answer on this topic

Cube
Chose Cube
Planful was just a bit too advanced (and costly) for what we needed at this point of our company (much like Adaptive). With those types of platforms, you really do need a consultant to help create the needs specific to your personal business, which ends up adding costs. Causal
Chose Cube
Causal is a much more sophisticated product, but would require that we completely switch away from all of our current models and using google sheets. Cube allowed us to continue operating as is, but with a quicker data connection.
Features
CausalCube
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Causal
9.3
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Cube
7.8
21 Ratings
3% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.01 Ratings8.96 Ratings
Customizable dashboards10.01 Ratings6.918 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates10.01 Ratings7.618 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Causal
8.3
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Cube
8.9
47 Ratings
10% above category average
Drill-down analysis9.01 Ratings9.646 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.01 Ratings8.435 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.01 Ratings9.728 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Causal
8.0
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Cube
8.3
21 Ratings
2% above category average
Publish to Web8.01 Ratings8.211 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.01 Ratings8.411 Ratings
Report Versioning8.01 Ratings8.515 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.01 Ratings8.48 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Causal
8.0
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Cube
8.6
12 Ratings
13% above category average
Predictive Analytics8.01 Ratings8.87 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.01 Ratings8.84 Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.711 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.18 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Causal
-
Ratings
Cube
9.4
40 Ratings
8% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.233 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.530 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.331 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.625 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Causal
-
Ratings
Cube
9.2
10 Ratings
17% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings9.69 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Causal
-
Ratings
Cube
7.7
54 Ratings
6% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings6.845 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.951 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings7.449 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings6.944 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.351 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Causal
-
Ratings
Cube
8.5
49 Ratings
8% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings8.944 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.523 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings7.113 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.314 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.332 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Causal
-
Ratings
Cube
8.3
54 Ratings
5% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.845 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.048 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.349 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings6.838 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Causal
-
Ratings
Cube
8.3
37 Ratings
3% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.130 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.815 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.228 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.428 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings7.922 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings9.211 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Causal
-
Ratings
Cube
9.0
46 Ratings
9% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.135 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.538 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.438 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CausalCube
Small Businesses
Supermetrics
Supermetrics
Score 9.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Supermetrics
Supermetrics
Score 9.5 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Dataiku
Dataiku
Score 8.4 out of 10
Prophix
Prophix
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CausalCube
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(58 ratings)
User Testimonials
CausalCube
Likelihood to Recommend
Causal, Inc
Definitely suited best for B2B / B2B2C product modelling. We used this for B2B / B2B2C / C2C and the C2C side of things was always more complex to model out due to this being dependent on marketing spend (CAC) and factors around virality which really cannot be forecasted (not a shortcoming of Causal, just implied by the mechanics of modelling)
Read full review
Cube Planning, Inc
1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis.
Read full review
Pros
Causal, Inc
No answers on this topic
Cube Planning, Inc
  • Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook.
  • Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor).
  • Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data.
  • Bulk range selection within a workbook.
Read full review
Cons
Causal, Inc
No answers on this topic
Cube Planning, Inc
  • Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10.
  • The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Causal, Inc
No answers on this topic
Cube Planning, Inc
Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Causal, Inc
No answers on this topic
Cube Planning, Inc
  • It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days
  • I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error
  • I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use
Read full review
ScreenShots