Cegid Talent (based on technology from the former Technomedia, acquired by Cegid in 2016), allows users to manage candidates recruiting, training, performance, compensation, career development and succession. Its business intelligence tools help identify organizational potential in order to drive HR strategies, from the cloud.
N/A
ProProfs LMS Software
Score8.9 out of 10
N/A
ProProfs LMS is a learning management system software that is designed
to help instructors create and deliver online training courses. The LMS offers
both businesses and educational institutions comprehensive training solutions
by allowing them to create online courses, complemented by tests, surveys,
polls and even a knowledge base.
$1
Pricing
Cegid Talent
ProProfs LMS Software
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
ESSENTIALS
$25
per month
PREMIUM
$38
per month
BUSINESS
$49
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cegid Talent
ProProfs LMS Software
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cegid Talent
ProProfs LMS Software
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Cegid Talent and ProProfs LMS Software
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.3
1 Ratings
75% below category average
ProProfs LMS Software
-
Ratings
New hire portal
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Cegid Talent and ProProfs LMS Software
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.0
1 Ratings
78% below category average
ProProfs LMS Software
-
Ratings
Manager note taking
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Cegid Talent and ProProfs LMS Software
Feature
Cegid Talent
2.0
1 Ratings
109% below category average
ProProfs LMS Software
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Cegid Talent and ProProfs LMS Software
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.5
1 Ratings
68% below category average
ProProfs LMS Software
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Cegid Talent and ProProfs LMS Software
Recruiting and human resources is a good use for this tool. To some degree, reporting is fairly appropriate as well, unless you want super detailed reports, then I would say no. Anything related to managing candidate flow and making the recruitment process easier is where this tool is best used, upgrades need to be made so it's more useful in other areas before rolling out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The commands and controls are fairly user friendly. This is a positive because as recruiters we don't want to waste time having to learn odd or awkward controls, we just want to intuitively click.
The original implementation process was fairly seamless according to industry standards. This made for a smoother rollout, testing, and implementation phase. We didn't waste too much time with overly complicated technical issues, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The reporting function needs to be vastly improved. You can run the most basic reports, but if you want to get more granular it requires customization, extra fees, and involving a developer. This piece should be made easier.
The lag time between load screens, clicking new screens, etc. was very slow at times. We don't believe this was a connectivity issue, rather something on Technomedia's end.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ProProfs is very bland-looking, rather Web 1.0. They have a very limited-number of templates, and they are not customizable. If the company is making any money, I think they should try to make it as aesthetically pleasing as possible.
ProProfs quizzes are not responsive to devices. A quiz looks exactly the same on an iPhone as it does on a computer screen. Students live in a world where everything they access online is customized to the device they use, but a ProProfs quiz will have small type on an iPhone, and won't allow a zoom by pinching.
Uploading images, audio, and video when making a quiz is a time-consuming task. Takes a lot of clicks. And there's no way to see your own library of uploaded stuff, so when you want to use a previously-uploaded image, you can't just find it in your account and attach it, you have to upload the same image every time. It's tedious.
Other LMSs I've used in the past year, like BookWidgets and iSpring Quiz Maker have a good deal more variety of question types than ProProfs. For example, you can't touch, drag and drop an answer on a blank from a word bank with a ProProfs quiz. Matching-type questions in ProProfs are limited to drop-down menu choices or radio buttons. There's no HTML5 magic at work.
ProProfs support is not bad (response within a day), but they can't explain frequent glitches that occur. Example: Nearly every time a class takes a quiz, there's ONE student who presses "submit" and their answers don't get submitted; instead, the loading circle just keeps rotating and the student panics, and then the student has to press refresh on their web browser, and --sometimes, but not always-- all their responses are erased and they have to take the quiz again. And there's nothing that a teacher can do. It's dreadful. Tell ProProfs about it, and they dodge the bullet because I wasn't able to give them enough info they required (e.g. what kind of phone?, what kind of OS?, what version?, was the device facing North?, etc).
ProProfs UI has not changed significantly in the 4 years I've been using them. I get the feeling that they're not trying hard enough.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ProProfs deserves the best of the best ratings. It makes learners the prime focus of every step of learning, and that’s the greatest thing about it. Besides, arranging and putting different relevant content together is a walk in the park. Everything is so straightforward. If you look at the customization options, they are equally amazing.
Technomedia stacks up below the other listed programs. It may solve the bare minimum of your issues, but when it comes to solving more complex issues and processes, it lacks. When you want to add additions or customize things, the process is very costly and labor intensive as well. If it were priced lower, it would make more sense, but there are much better solutions out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info