7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 6.5 out of 100
6 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.6 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Cerner HealtheIntent

My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework.If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Meditech Electronic Health Records

Meditech is fine for an acute product or in your OR.
Ryan Geiler | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

Billing and Claims Management

Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.4
Real-time eligibility verification
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.0
Claims management
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
5.0
Coding
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
5.0
Patient billing
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.0
Financial Reporting
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.0

Patient Scheduling

Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.6
Rule-based scheduling
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.0
Automated appointment reminders
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
2.0
Automated patient check-in
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.0
Multi-location support
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0
Calendar interface
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
6.0

Electronic Medical Records

Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
5.5
Charting / document management
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0
Templates
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
6.0
Patient portal
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
6.0
Mobile/tablet support
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
5.0
Fax integration
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
6.0
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
3.0
Workflow automation
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
5.0
Speech recognition
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
3.0
Customization
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0
E-prescribing
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0

Medical Security and Privacy

Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.8
HIPAA compliance
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
9.0
Role-based permission levels
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
9.0
Data backups and redundancy
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
6.0
Local mode / networking failsafe
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0

Workflow and Scale

Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
6.0
Task tracking
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0
Specialty-specific workflows
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
4.0
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities
Cerner HealtheIntent
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0

Pros

Cerner HealtheIntent

  • Reliability means Cerner HealtheIntent hardly ever goes down
  • Cerner HealtheIntent can be customized for our business needs
  • We have our own Cerner HealtheIntent server instead of using the cloud
Drew Spangler | TrustRadius Reviewer

Meditech Electronic Health Records

  • Clean interface, easy to see alerts
  • Light footprint on computers, quick to load
  • Good organization of clinical material on the toolbar
Ryan Geiler | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Cerner HealtheIntent

  • Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
  • To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
  • Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Meditech Electronic Health Records

  • Poor reporting
  • Difficult to view grid data, such as complete medication history
  • A lot of interfacing with its own product due to code differences
Ryan Geiler | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Cerner HealtheIntent

We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
Drew Spangler | TrustRadius Reviewer

Meditech Electronic Health Records

No answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Cerner HealtheIntent

  • ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
  • The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
  • If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Meditech Electronic Health Records

No answers on this topic

Pricing Details

Cerner HealtheIntent

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Meditech Electronic Health Records

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

Cerner HealtheIntent
6.0
Meditech Electronic Health Records
7.0

Add comparison