8 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.6 out of 100
7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.1 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Billing and Claims Management

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    4.4

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    44%
    Meditech Electronic Health Records ranks higher in 5/5 features

    Real-time eligibility verification

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    4.0
    40%
    1 Rating

    Claims management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    5.0
    50%
    1 Rating

    Coding

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    5.0
    50%
    1 Rating

    Patient billing

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    4.0
    40%
    1 Rating

    Financial Reporting

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    4.0
    40%
    1 Rating

    Patient Scheduling

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    4.6

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    46%
    Meditech Electronic Health Records ranks higher in 5/5 features

    Rule-based scheduling

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    4.0
    40%
    1 Rating

    Automated appointment reminders

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    2.0
    20%
    1 Rating

    Automated patient check-in

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    4.0
    40%
    1 Rating

    Multi-location support

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.0
    70%
    1 Rating

    Calendar interface

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.0
    60%
    1 Rating

    Electronic Medical Records

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    6.4

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    64%
    Meditech Electronic Health Records ranks higher in 10/10 features

    Charting / document management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.0
    70%
    2 Ratings

    Templates

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.0
    60%
    1 Rating

    Patient portal

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.0
    60%
    1 Rating

    Mobile/tablet support

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    2 Ratings

    Fax integration

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    2 Ratings

    Integration with other EMR and PM systems

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    3.0
    30%
    1 Rating

    Workflow automation

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    5.0
    50%
    1 Rating

    Speech recognition

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    3.0
    30%
    1 Rating

    Customization

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.0
    90%
    2 Ratings

    E-prescribing

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.0
    90%
    2 Ratings

    Medical Security and Privacy

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    8.3

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    83%
    Meditech Electronic Health Records ranks higher in 4/4 features

    HIPAA compliance

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    10.0
    100%
    3 Ratings

    Role-based permission levels

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    10.0
    100%
    2 Ratings

    Data backups and redundancy

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    6.0
    60%
    1 Rating

    Local mode / networking failsafe

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.0
    70%
    1 Rating

    Workflow and Scale

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    8.0

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    80%
    Meditech Electronic Health Records ranks higher in 3/3 features

    Task tracking

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.0
    70%
    1 Rating

    Specialty-specific workflows

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.0
    70%
    2 Ratings

    Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    10.0
    100%
    2 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Meditech Electronic Health Records is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    6.0

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    60%
    2 Ratings
    9.0

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    90%
    2 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework.If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    Meditech is well-suited to small, independent hospitals requiring a flexible, mostly full-featured EHR with good support. The Expanse upgrade was a significant step forward, and brought the system into the modern world of touch devices while reducing clinician documentation burden.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pros

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    • Reliability means Cerner HealtheIntent hardly ever goes down
    • Cerner HealtheIntent can be customized for our business needs
    • We have our own Cerner HealtheIntent server instead of using the cloud
    Drew Spangler | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    • Clean interface, easy to see alerts
    • Light footprint on computers, quick to load
    • Good organization of clinical material on the toolbar
    Ryan Geiler | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Cons

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    • Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
    • To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
    • Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    • Poor reporting
    • Difficult to view grid data, such as complete medication history
    • A lot of interfacing with its own product due to code differences
    Ryan Geiler | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pricing Details

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Alternatives Considered

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
    Drew Spangler | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    No answers on this topic

    Return on Investment

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    • ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
    • The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
    • If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Meditech Electronic Health Records

    No answers on this topic

    Add comparison