TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Score3.5 out of 10
    N/ACerner offers their population health management software platform, HealtheIntent, their cloud-based data reconciliation and population stratification platform to provide a comprehensive population health management solution.N/A

    Tebra EHR

    Score1 out of 10
    N/ATebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.

    $150

    per provider/per month

    Pricing
    Cerner HealtheIntentTebra EHR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
    $150
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
    $300
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Billing Services
    Contact sales team
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cerner HealtheIntentTebra EHR
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cerner HealtheIntentTebra EHR
    Billing and Claims Management
    Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    4.0
    5 Ratings
    61% below category average
    Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Claims management00 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Coding00 Ratings4.05 Ratings
    Patient Scheduling
    Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    1.0
    4 Ratings
    154% below category average
    Calendar interface00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Electronic Medical Records
    Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    2.2
    5 Ratings
    106% below category average
    Charting / document management00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Templates00 Ratings2.04 Ratings
    Patient portal00 Ratings1.05 Ratings
    Speech recognition00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Customization00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    E-prescribing00 Ratings1.03 Ratings
    Medical Security and Privacy
    Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    8.0
    5 Ratings
    4% below category average
    HIPAA compliance00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cerner HealtheIntentTebra EHR
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cerner HealtheIntentTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cerner HealtheIntentTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework. If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    Kareo is not an appropriate application for any real-world clinical need. It is highly unreliable, crashing frequently, and often becomes frozen. It also cannot ingest data from Therapy Notes, which was a promised feature of the platform according to the sales team. Additionally, when we ran into reliability issues (every day, with every clinician at the practice, across a dozen different office locations with different internet service providers) we were not offered the ability to cancel our contract. Until the reliability issues are fixed Kareo is not well-suited to any use case because it does not work.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Reliability means Cerner HealtheIntent hardly ever goes down
    • Cerner HealtheIntent can be customized for our business needs
    • We have our own Cerner HealtheIntent server instead of using the cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Catching missing patient info
    • Catching missing insurance info
    • Providing mailing addresses
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
    • To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
    • Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Everything created can always use adjusting depending on the situation
    • Adapting to client needs quicker
    • Problems are not reported in a timely manner
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Tebra
    Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Tebra
    The user interface is fine but it the app constantly freezes or crashes.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
    • The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
    • If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • We have negative reviews as we were sold a product that left out some key variables. Things we really needed to make the transition.
    • I don't think KAREO is good for small business (0-10 employees) because their prices for additional or standard features is steep. They charge by the therapist to boot and it is steep!
    • Again ASK questions; do a test run; ask about the migration of your data and its charges.
    • You sign with them you will be locked into a 12 month contract with no out clause. If they are costing you the money you have to stay with them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots