Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Epicor BisTrack
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Epicor BisTrack is business management software for lumber and building materials (LBM) dealers and distributors based on technology acquired with SolarSoft Business Systems in 2012. It covers inventory optimization, delivery dispatch, financial management, customer relationship management, and more recently warehouse management, as well as supplying business analytics.
N/A
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
Epicor BisTrack
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
Epicor BisTrack
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
Epicor BisTrack
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
11% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
5.0
1 Ratings
41% below category average
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% below category average
Epicor BisTrack
7.8
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
5% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
3 Ratings
3% below category average
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
7.92 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
2% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
6.3
1 Ratings
20% below category average
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
22% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
2 Ratings
5% below category average
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
6.12 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
7.92 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.2
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor BisTrack
8.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor BisTrack
7.2
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
7.82 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Certinia FM Cloud and Epicor BisTrack
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
Specifically Eipcor comes in handy daily by easily tracking manpower, deliveries, inspections, and other daily tracked items. It is well suited for day to day operations where others can fill in or pick up if somewhere were out of the office. Epicor is less appropriate in providing weekly updates to teams and customers. It is easier to extract the necessary information off of the software to generate your own reports then try to procure one using the software itself.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Epicor BisTrack is essential for those in the lumber and building materials industry, especially if they are in the wholesale/distribution side of things. I provided the rating because I feel that BisTrack has contributed a lot for my company and provided with essential information for decision-making on a day-to-day basis. The score also reflects that while BisTrack is an essential software for my business, there is also room for improvement so that the end users will be able to obtain what they need from the software.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
Apologies, our company's IT department contacts support on our behalf. I have never contacted Epicor BisTrack's support myself; only through my company's IT team.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info