Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
DELMIAWorks
Score8 out of 10
N/A
DELMIAWorks (formerly EnterpriseIQ) is an industry specific ERP from IQMS, now a Dassault Systemes brand, developed for manufacturers in the aerospace, assembly, automotive, food, general manufacturing, medical devices, plastics, rubber, metal fabrication, packaging, stamping, and similar industries.
N/A
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
DELMIAWorks
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
DELMIAWorks
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
DELMIAWorks
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
11% above category average
DELMIAWorks
2.2
3 Ratings
109% below category average
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
DELMIAWorks
7.0
2 Ratings
7% below category average
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% above category average
DELMIAWorks
10.0
7 Ratings
17% above category average
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
5% above category average
DELMIAWorks
7.3
6 Ratings
3% below category average
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
2% above category average
DELMIAWorks
8.2
6 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
23% above category average
DELMIAWorks
8.5
8 Ratings
6% above category average
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
2% above category average
DELMIAWorks
7.3
7 Ratings
8% below category average
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
14% above category average
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and DELMIAWorks
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Accounting reports: accrued receipts reporting makes it difficult to reconcile.
Fixed assets: depreciation posts to the general ledger at the asset level, generating inordinately large numbers of relatively meaningless transactions.
Process cost: PIT display lacks many useful fields, including vendor name and number.
Financial reports carry beyond two decimal places.
Report structures are not sensibly arranged, and many reports imbed data within text fields, making manipulation and reporting more time-consuming.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
The menu system is easy to navigate and intuitive for users. The learning curve for administrators is quite steep form setting up user permissions to creating reports for users. This is a very powerful system with many dynamics to help most companies. Expandability is always there and it comes down to how granular you would like your company to be on a data gathering/reporting and material flow process.
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
It is nice that an IQMS employee helps you with the implementation, however they were more of a technical resource than a project management resource. I wish they could provide a more off the shelf timeline given their experience in implementing the system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This is the only software that I have used so I am unable to rate it based on another type of software. My experience with IQ is extensive though, and have worked and learned in all areas and love how this program works. The many different modules are relatively easy to learn and they offer support if you need additional instruction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Our implementation of warehouse management was probably the best investment our company has made recently. The control gained over our inventory is a tremendous asset and allows to see in an instant whether or not we can meet our customers' demands.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info