CGI Tapestry vs. inriver PIM

inRiver [PIM] is pretty easy to use. I can see a company with a more narrow product selection benefiting from this PIM. The challenge comes with the more SKUs and categories the company offers. Without our 3rd party implementor creating specialized imports for us, we would be having a difficult time managing mass data updates.

Incentivized

• Scalability
• Data Integrations
• Workflow

Incentivized

• Missing the ability to be able to right click an item/product to open in a new tab
• Mass Asset/SKU management is not an out-of-the-box feature
• Shared folders area - few options to create a specialized area that you can block other users from deleting

Incentivized

inRiver has been both helpful and responsive to our needs. Their customer service and ticketing system are top-notch - timely communications and followup

Incentivized

When I compared these other PIM platforms, I found several were not true PIM systems. Although they solved for some significant syndication challenges, they did not have the ability to build a relational databased across products and categories. Furthermore, the interface is much more user-friendly and the ability to engage the entire team with workflow is a big plus!

Incentivized

• Quicker go-to-market
• Improved templates for customer data
• Scalable for our growing organization

Incentivized