Checkmarx vs. Portainer
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkmarx | Score7.6 out of 10 | N/A | Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST) | N/A |
Portainer | Score9.8 out of 10 | N/A | Portainer is a centralized container management platform for containerized apps and IoT device management. It helps accelerate container adoption and reduce time-to-value on Kubernetes, Docker, and Swarm with a management portal, allowing users to deliver and manage containerized applications from the data center to the edge. Portainer helps - Reduce the operational complexity associated with multi-cluster management Bridge the skills gap and facilitate feature… | $0 |
| Checkmarx | Portainer | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmarx | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 94 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 87 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 94 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 75 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 92 Answers | |
| Checkmarx | Portainer | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Checkmarx | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Checkmarx | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | 7.7 | 8.5 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Checkmarx | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Portainer Screenshots |





