Likelihood to Recommend The most appropriate scenarios to implement email security is in companies that want to protect the use of electronic mail since it is one of the security breaches that are currently used to perform any type of attack. Very effective integration with Office 365 and it is highly recommended to add the functionality of advanced malware protection
Read full review Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is well suited for bigger companies with huge numbers of incoming and outgoing emails. It is really easy to configure, and once setup, there is not much to be done. So this requires minimal administration efforts. However, as the reporting is weak, if this is essential for a company, then it would be better to look into other alternatives.
Read full review Pros Cisco Email Security addresses all the major forms of data attacks like phishing, ransomware and malware propagation. Its content encryption capabilities safeguard against any data loss potential through outgoing emails. Read full review Deep Discovery analyzer provides sandboxing and deep threat analyses DLP capabilities are also good. It has a number of pre defined DLP templates Works very well against targeted attacks Lowers impact at the email gateway as it filters away the email in the cloud Read full review Cons Outlook integration in terms of a plug-in would be great. Currently, users can't add something to a blacklist or whitelist directly from Outlook. Management of the platform is done from two portals the ESA and SMA. It would be nice to have it all in one management portal. A quick start management guide would be nice. The manual is over 1,000 pages, so there is definitely a lot of functionality in this service. Read full review Higher false positive rate for Spam detection. Logging can be difficult to search. Read full review Support Rating Cisco TAC support is very good since they have engineers available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Important to mention that you must have the support of the solution enabled to be able to receive a response from TAC and that we can be taken care of. The only drawback may be that they will not be able to see settings of the email provider you use.
Read full review Easy to use, easy to pull data, easy to see what is going on in our specific environment.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Cisco was at least better than or equal to the others but within our budget. It provided all of the services of anti-spam, content filtering, anti-virus, DLP, encrypted email service, scalability, and more than the others. Cisco name and reputation were also key in our decision.
Read full review Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is much cheaper than Kasprsky Security for Email Server. Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security is easier to install and the maintenance effort required is much less than this required by Kasprsky Security for Email Server. However Kasprsky Security for Email Server does have a better GUI and does indeed offer a better protection degree. However, taking into account that both were tested behind a firewall, most of the threats had already been eliminated there...
Read full review Return on Investment Saves us precious resources by blocking unwanted E-mail right at the edge of our network. Users can work more efficient when all spam and malware is stopped before reaching their inboxes. Enables us to protect our outgoing mail with DKIM signing and validate all incoming mail on the most modern securiry standards. Read full review We have been able to see threats more easily now than before and have become more aware towards them The IT infra footprint has become more secure and controlled Read full review ScreenShots