Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) vs. IBM Storage Fusion
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) provides distributed, resilient, high-performance storage and retrieval of binary large object (blob) data. Object storage is distributed across a cluster of hardware systems, or nodes. The storage cluster is resilient against hard drive failure within a node and against node failure within a cluster. Nodes can be added to or removed from the cluster to adjust cluster capacity as needed. | N/A |
![]() IBM Storage Fusion | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Storage Fusion is the foundation for container-native applications running on Red Hat OpenShift, which provides enterprise grade data-storage and protection services. This solution includes data services that are critical for global enterprise applications and a data driven Red Hat OpenShift environment. IBM Storage Fusion is built on a technology that provides global access to data to container applications. The application sees the data as another local file… | N/A |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | IBM Storage Fusion | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | IBM Storage Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | IBM Storage Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Storage Scale Score9.9 out of 10 | IBM Storage Scale Score9.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | IBM Storage Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | IBM Storage Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
| Usability |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]() Incentivized |
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
| ScreenShots |




