Cisco Cloud Web Security vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Remote and telework but not for onsite filtering.

Incentivized

This service may be useful for some businesses, so it's important to try it before deciding. It offers multiple layers of protection for both assisted and unassisted attacks, sandboxing (for obfuscated attacks), and a decent anti-phishing tool. It can be tricky to set up, but not the end of the world. In our case, unfortunately, the false positives were just unbearable.

Incentivized

• Flexibility
• Scalable
• Ease of administration

Incentivized

• Neural network based anti-phishing and anti-spam for multilayered security.
• Scalable resources according to business growth.
• Flexible to use in almost all devices.

Incentivized

• Intuitiveness of the UI
• Real time reporting
• Report detail

Incentivized

• False positives.
• Integration can be fiddly.

Incentivized

CWS is on par with Forcepoint cloud web security. It offers flexibility and scalability.

Incentivized

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is very easy to set up and has way fewer false positives than Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. It has virtually the same features as the Kaspersky alternative and it is extremely easy to set up. It feels like Microsoft Exchange Online Protection gives slightly more transparency about its conclusions, which allows users to make an informed decision about certain messages.

Incentivized

• Increased security
• Decrease in number of infections

Incentivized

• Balance our manpower distribution in between security team and management team.
• Help to create secure work environment for all staff.
• Reduce our cost by proper utilization of security budget.

Incentivized