Cisco CloudLock vs. Cyren DNS Security (Cyren Web Security) vs. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

Cisco Cloudlock is a good fit for my organization consisting of 150 end users. While we have a small office product that can expand to cover any size organization, I would assume the overhead to monitor would increase. While my organization's business is in real estate, I would highly recommend this for all businesses that handle sensitive and private data. Being able to monitor our cloud infrastructure has allowed our security team to be more flexible in allowing approved users access as well.

Incentivized

For any form of company control on a larger scale where threats can have a very detrimental effect but not suited to SME scenarios was cost factor would be a key component and not require as much automation.

Incentivized

Symantec Web Security Service monitors and filters network traffic to protect web servers from cyberattacks. Its single dashboard view, excellent UI/UX, and easy DLP integration make it a market leader. Excellent sandboxing for safe browsing in restricted IT networks. Threat categorization and stateful SSL description of web traffic to identify dynamic threat vectors. However, alerts and notifications only work quickly when large-scale DDoS attacks happen.

Incentivized

• Cisco CloudLock offers a remote access options, very efficient and standard.
• Robust data security and monitoring of the sensitive database.
• Has an excellent self service, which is an option for quick operational progress.

Incentivized

• Category Control in multiple languages.
• Simple interface controls whever I am.
• Swift and experienced support team.

Incentivized

• Complete web protection.
• Easy to setup.
• Great reputation and credibility.

Incentivized

• Although alert mechanism is good but it delays a bit.
• For implementation of DLP we had to hire a expert it took a lot of time to set up.
• Support [in my experience] is not good.

Incentivized

• Some enhancements to filetype control as PDF's can be flagged wrongly preventing download as executables
• Quicker log updating on the fly error checking.

Incentivized

• Advanced and targeted attacks
• Policy granularity
• better support

Incentivized

They are very quick to respond and go the extra mile to help address our issues. That said, we've only needed them at the early stages of implementation for support help and occasionally when we want to do a full re-scan of our site. They are very flexible in working with us on the timing of such scans.

Incentivized

The support has become average ever since broadcom acquisition and they moving to GCP. There is no focus of existing customers as the presale do not exist

Incentivized

Amazon Macie is limited to an AWS environment and fulfills some of the same functions that CloudLock does in SaaS products. Both are very valuable tools, so the decision is not really which to use, but whether to use both for their respective environments. In general I feel CloudLock is a more powerful tool because it connects to Microsoft 365, which is more business critical for our organization, but that really is a personal call.

Incentivized

Better price point and interface and system thinking ahead to the future and not re-using the same old systems.

Incentivized

Symantec Web Security Service is a powerful tool for moderating website traffic and protecting user data. Easy DLP integration makes it a market leader, and it works with Symantec DLP and EDR to protect remote users' browsing activity. Threat categorization and stateful SSL description of web traffic to identify dynamic threat vectors. Unified threat dashboard with seamless alerting. So compared to other solutions, it is standout.

Incentivized

• Allowed data to be accessed.
• Secured data.
• Meet client security requirements.

Incentivized

• Protected against some dangerous day zero threats.

Incentivized

• Slightly on the costlier side.
• Less risk of security lapse.
• Extensive protection against web attacks.

Incentivized