Cisco Secure Access vs. Netskope Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Secure Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
A cloud-delivered security service edge (SSE) solution, grounded in zero trust, designed to give users an exceptional user experience and protected access from any device to anywhere.N/A
Netskope Private Access
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Secure AccessNetskope Private Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure AccessNetskope Private Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Cisco Secure AccessNetskope Private Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Access
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
10.0
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Access
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
7.5
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Access
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
6.8
4 Ratings
14% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.64 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings6.04 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.34 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Access
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
7.8
4 Ratings
9% below category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Secure AccessNetskope Private Access
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Secure AccessNetskope Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(33 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(1 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Secure AccessNetskope Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Cisco as a whole solution, Cisco Secure Access as a solution is very well suited. If you want to simplify the operations and the way that you provide access to certain things, rollout and deployment are fairly straightforward and fairly fast if you know how to configure it properly. Regarding private access, there's still some things that need to be addressed to mitigate certain connections that aren't working correctly through the VPN, or maybe create some kind of exception. The most famous ones are things with Microsoft or other vendors, where, when you send that information through the VPN, split tunnels aren't necessarily the only configurations you have to consider. Things like IPS, decryption, you also have to look at those things as well. It might be good to try to enhance those types of configurations and maybe also document those things so that the users are aware.
Read full review
Netskope
For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • In my experience, zta (zero trust access) is done well in Cisco Secure Access
  • In my opinion, segmentation is done well in Cisco Secure Access
  • I think traffic security is done well in Cisco Secure Access
  • In my experience, enterprise security is done well in Cisco Secure Access
Read full review
Netskope
  • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
  • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
  • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • The integration into the Meraki dashboard is not yet complete, you have to use several interfaces to complete the configuration, the services should be fully integrated to provide better handling
  • Integration of firewall rules onprem and cloud should be standardized
  • Better user management / import
Read full review
Netskope
  • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
It's simpler to identify or find things within the platform. Obviously, there are always things to improve, maybe in the GUI or in certain things coming over from Umbrella, because this platform is actually adopting a lot of the Umbrella solutions. And it's just a matter of trying to navigate through it. I really like the way it's simplified in how you categorize your internal policies and your private access policies. It's just a different mindset and a different way of creating policies in this case, compared to how Umbrella did in the past with rule sets and those kinds of things. But the actual solution itself works pretty well when you understand it.
Read full review
Netskope
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Netskope
The process was smooth and well managed.
There was probably good technical coordination and support.
There were only minor details that could be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We selected Cisco Secure Access due to the intuitive GUI and ease of use. The agent deployment was simple and easy to maintain. Any additional updates or changes were quickly deployed, and users found the customized block messages useful. From analytics and management, the Secure Access Product has been simple to manage and provides a robust level of security and flexibility that we haven't found in any other product yet.
Read full review
Netskope
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • The impact Cisco Secure Access has on our organization's overall business objectives is that we Replaced Bomgar
  • Another impact Cisco Secure Access has on our organization's overall business objectives is that it Eliminated giving vendors AD accounts
  • A third impact Cisco Secure Access has on our organization's overall business objectives is that Cisco Secure Access is Quick to deploy
Read full review
Netskope
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
Read full review
ScreenShots