Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)

• Identifies malware, malicious processes/services and other events well
• Great automated actions features such as host isolation
• Detailed threat visibility such as file trajectory
• Integration with other Cisco suite of security products
• Great value
• Low false positive rate
• Lightweight agent
• Variety of reporting
• Stable agent

Read full review

• Mitigates exposure to unwanted files and malware.
• Ease of Use and Management.
• Administrator control unlike standard antivirus purchased in the consumer/small business market.

Read full review

• Event search function. The searching is very limited and allows for poor filtering choices.
• Slowness. The web GUI is far slower than most Cisco products.
• Sync issues. When attempting to move a device from one group to another or start isolation on a device, there is a sizable delay in communication with the device that can cause operations to fail.

Read full review

• Stability, they could grow when it comes to updates to the client. There always seems to be complications.
• Locking of systems. In the event of trouble, systems lock down so far that the administrator has to drive to the location where device is located, uninstall and reinstall.

Read full review

• AMP has been able to catch some serious infections and stop them from doing huge damage in our environment.
• The overall cost of AMP vs the cost of not having this protection and getting hit with malware, or other nefarious damage to your environment is well worth the money.

Read full review

• Increased [efficiency]
• Can centrally manage the endpoints
• Mitigation of threats/vulnerabilities to the endpoint

Read full review