Cisco Secure Workload vs. Zabbix
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Secure Workload | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | The Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) platform offers holistic workload protection for multicloud data centers by enabling a zero-trust model using segmentation. This approach allows users to identify security incidents faster, contain lateral movement, and reduce the attack surface. Tetration's infrastructure-agnostic approach supports both on-premises and public cloud workloads. | N/A |
Zabbix | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Zabbix is an open-source network performance monitoring software. It includes prebuilt official and community-developed templates for integrating with networks, applications, and endpoints, and can automate some monitoring processes. | N/A |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Zabbix | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Cisco Secure Workload software is licensed based on the number of workload equivalents or devices (endpoints) depending on the agent or sensor type being used. Telemetry data can be collected using agents, supported by other supported sensors or collectors, in any combination. Policy enforcement is enabled through agents with enforcement capability with infrastructure enforcement delivered through Cisco Secure Firewall Integration, Application Delivery Controllers (ADCs), and Security Groups in public cloud infrastructure or orchestrated via streamed Kafka policy. Workload is defined as a virtual machine, bare-metal server, or container host and includes server and desktop operating systems. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Secure Workload | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 15 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 15 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Icinga Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | HPE OneView Score6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.6 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Cisco Secure Workload | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Cisco Secure Workload Screenshots |




