TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco TrustSec vs. Tenable Cloud Security vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco TrustSec

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Tenable Cloud Security

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/ATenable Cloud Security (formerly Tenable.cs) enables security teams to continuously assess the security posture of their cloud environments by maintaining a current inventory of cloud assets for proactive analysis whenever a new vulnerability is published without a user having to take any actions. It includes technology from Accurics, acquired by Tenable in September 2021.N/A

    Tufin Orchestration Suite

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AIsraeli company Tufin offers a firewall security management offering via the Tufin Orchestration Suite, including SecureApp for managing network connectivity, SecureChange network change automation, and SecureTrack multi-vendor and next-generation firewall management.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco TrustSecTenable Cloud SecurityTufin Orchestration Suite
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco TrustSecTenable Cloud SecurityTufin Orchestration Suite
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cisco TrustSecTenable Cloud SecurityTufin Orchestration Suite
    Firewall Security Management
    Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Cisco TrustSec and Tenable Cloud Security and Tufin Orchestration Suite
    Feature
    Cisco TrustSec
    -
    Ratings
    Tenable Cloud Security
    -
    Ratings
    Tufin Orchestration Suite
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Policy planning and rule management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Automated Policy Orchestration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
    Device Discovery00 Ratings00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
    Policy Compliance Auditing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
    Attack Path Simulation Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings5.62 Ratings
    Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Scans00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Firewall Rule Cleanup00 Ratings00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco TrustSecTenable Cloud SecurityTufin Orchestration Suite
    Small Businesses
    Armor
    Score6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Micro Deep Security
    Score9 out of 10
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Palo Alto Panorama
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS CloudTrail
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Defender for Cloud
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Palo Alto Panorama
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco TrustSecTenable Cloud SecurityTufin Orchestration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco TrustSecTenable Cloud SecurityTufin Orchestration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
    • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
    • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
    • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    In its current version, it is basic. There are nice new features that should provide a good overall picture of the configuration and security of the account.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    Well suited scenarios - 1) Firewall Policy / Ruleset management 2) Where all the products are from Tufin like TOS ST, SC, SecureApp etc 3) Where customer focuses on ruleset compliance - USP violations, and other features Less suited - 1) Agnostic/distributed environment - Tough with integrate with 3rd party like CyberArk 2) FW recertification processes / exception process when complex process is included
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
    • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Easy to connect to cloud account
    • Provides basic configuration details or account, networking, what's public
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • Firewall management
    • Compliance reports
    • Unused rules and optimization
    • Policy Automation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • Help and solutions if needed, support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Difficult to attribute the vulnerabilities to the correct instance - cloud is too dynamic. Is supposed to be fixed in new version - we will see.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • Palo Alto Networks Integration
    • Better/more user friendly api for integration with ticketing systems
    • Web UI structure is not user-friendly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable
    We looked at this over a year ago, the space was still young. Censys provided what we originally needed, but was soon outdone by Tenable with their initial release. I am sure that Censys improved as well, but it was easier to expand on our current Tenable license.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    1) Fairly okay overall but definitely needs improvement overall Vs the other products available in the market like Palo Alto XSOAR 2) Cost wise okay at the beginning but when client demands add-ons/ more features/customization tailored to their needs, Tufin Orchestration Suite recommends RFE / custom costs/development costs 3) USP feature is cool to use overall Vs FireMon 4) Tufin ProServ needs to buckle-up/Support compared to other competitors in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Reduction in IT operational costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Being a Tenable One customer - these are just new features we suddenly own. As long as you have the asset count available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • I think if you correctly configure your SIEM, you don't need Tufin. You can correlate a lot of things for firewalls.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots