TrustRadius

Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) vs. Enghouse BorderNet SBC

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) is a session border controller, which provides session control, security, interworking, and demarcation. CUBE is a software product available for licensing on the Cisco IOS® and Cisco IOS XE Software which runs on Cisco enterprise routers, but is also available for licensing as a software load for a virtual container.N/A
Enghouse BorderNet SBC
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Enghouse BorderNet SBC replaces the former Dialogic session border controller, that was acquired by Enghouse. It is presented as a single software elastic SBC with high availability (HA) deployments in Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure clouds, as well as on leading hypervisors and bare metal commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) platforms.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Enghouse BorderNet SBC
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Enghouse BorderNet SBC
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Enghouse BorderNet SBC
Best Alternatives
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Enghouse BorderNet SBC
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Avaya Aura
Avaya Aura
Score 7.6 out of 10
Avaya Aura
Avaya Aura
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Avaya Aura
Avaya Aura
Score 7.6 out of 10
Avaya Aura
Avaya Aura
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Enghouse BorderNet SBC
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Enghouse BorderNet SBC
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
If you are in an environment that is primarily Cisco and switching from PRI circuits or other non-SIP circuits and are generally considered to be on an enterprise-grade platform, CUBE is likely a solid choice for you. From my experience, I cannot speak to the video handling that CUBE offers as we do not employ that, so hopefully other reviews will provide insight on that.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Pros
Cisco
  • Call accounting (Integration with 3rd party applications for ease of use and comprehensive CDR's)
  • Address hiding (Keeping your internal network secure with PSTN calls)
  • Internetworking between multiple protocols
  • SIP profiles (message/header customization)
  • Billing, cost counting
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Cons
Cisco
  • The way to configure is not so intuitive.
  • It cannot show SIP ladder diagram directly.
  • The learning curve is a bit steep.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
I rated Cisco Unified Border Element’s (CUBE) usability an 9 out of 10. It offers excellent flexibility, reliability, and integration with Microsoft Teams Direct Routing. However, its configuration can be complex for non-experts. Once properly implemented, it provides powerful SIP control, security, and scalability in both virtual and hybrid voice environments that we require.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
It is very powerful and secure. However, for most people, it is a bit difficult to learn how to configure and debug.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We previously used other SBC's but weren't satisfied with the performance. The support wasn't there and constant RMA's for defective hardware. Although the CUBE is expensive, it saves time and resources on support. Robust features and no downtime in 3 years. I don't believe many vendors offer products to compete in this space. You will regret to decision to go with cheaper SBC's.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Positive impact, saving on monthly phone bills due to sip trunk migration.
  • Positive, using a couple of CUBEs to concentrate several SIP trunk.
  • Positive, using a couple of CUBEs to route several branch outbound and inbound calls.
Samuel Vitales | TrustRadius Reviewer
Samuel Vitales
Cisco Collaboration Technical Lead
Read full review
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots