TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) vs. Ingate SIParator

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AThe Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) is a session border controller, which provides session control, security, interworking, and demarcation. CUBE is a software product available for licensing on the Cisco IOS® and Cisco IOS XE Software which runs on Cisco enterprise routers, but is also available for licensing as a software load for a virtual container.N/A

    Ingate SIParator

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Ingate SIParator
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Ingate SIParator
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Ingate SIParator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE)Ingate SIParator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    If you are in an environment that is primarily Cisco and switching from PRI circuits or other non-SIP circuits and are generally considered to be on an enterprise-grade platform, CUBE is likely a solid choice for you. From my experience, I cannot speak to the video handling that CUBE offers as we do not employ that, so hopefully other reviews will provide insight on that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ingate Systems
    The Ingate SIParators bases on my level of experience would be good for mid to large-size organizations looking for a device/firewall to set in between outside and inside traffic. This device provides an excellent level of protection and is easily managed. I believe a small level organization of 50 or less users could find a less expensive solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • Call accounting (Integration with 3rd party applications for ease of use and comprehensive CDR's)
    • Address hiding (Keeping your internal network secure with PSTN calls)
    • Internetworking between multiple protocols
    • SIP profiles (message/header customization)
    • Billing, cost counting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ingate Systems
    • Customer Service
    • Ease of Use
    • Documentation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • The way to configure is not so intuitive.
    • It cannot show SIP ladder diagram directly.
    • The learning curve is a bit steep.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ingate Systems
    • Price
    • Updates
    • Website Update
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cisco
    I rated Cisco Unified Border Element’s (CUBE) usability an 9 out of 10. It offers excellent flexibility, reliability, and integration with Microsoft Teams Direct Routing. However, its configuration can be complex for non-experts. Once properly implemented, it provides powerful SIP control, security, and scalability in both virtual and hybrid voice environments that we require.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ingate Systems
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Cisco
    It is very powerful and secure. However, for most people, it is a bit difficult to learn how to configure and debug.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ingate Systems
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    We previously used other SBC's but weren't satisfied with the performance. The support wasn't there and constant RMA's for defective hardware. Although the CUBE is expensive, it saves time and resources on support. Robust features and no downtime in 3 years. I don't believe many vendors offer products to compete in this space. You will regret to decision to go with cheaper SBC's.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ingate Systems
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Positive impact, saving on monthly phone bills due to sip trunk migration.
    • Positive, using a couple of CUBEs to concentrate several SIP trunk.
    • Positive, using a couple of CUBEs to route several branch outbound and inbound calls.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ingate Systems
    • Mostly Expenses
    • Reliablity
    • Availablity
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots