ClockShark vs. Wagepoint

ClockShark works well to keep track of employees' time at work. Employees use their cell phones to clock in and out every day. It is easy to edit times if an employee makes a mistake or forgets to clock in/out. I like being able to run reports any time, with and timeframes, and edit reports if necessary.

Incentivized

I highly recommend Wagepoint, especially for start-up companies. Their fees are really cheap and the quality of their work is really good. They may have room for improvement on the reporting side, but given their flexibility, they can always find a way to help your organization. I definitely recommend Wagepoint.

Incentivized

• track hours
• track location of employees
• easy to use

Incentivized

• Manages payroll
• Maintains employee data--addresses, contact info, etc.

Incentivized

• GPS location can improve
• check locations more often

Incentivized

• Reports need to be improve. You cannot customize your preferred report. Thus, manual reporting happens at times. But you can't complain on the cost.
• Flexibility on late notice of payroll processing. Lowering additional fees could help us.
• Need to ask clients for feedback on the use of system.

Incentivized

Wagepoint is great for our Canadian employees, as Gusto does not support multi-national workforces. However, Gusto provides a much more robust system with which you can manage employees salaries, healthcare benefits, and additional benefits. Gusto also provides ample data with which to evaluate costs, understand employees, and forecast future costs, which Wagepoint does not support.

Incentivized

• makes payroll easier
• quick downloads
• easy to use

Incentivized

• Lower payroll administration expenses
• Time and effort is saved from filing remittances to relevant government bodies.
• Timely and accurate reporting of our payroll

Incentivized