Clonezilla vs. OpenText AccuRev

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Clonezilla
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Clonezilla is free and open source software for disk imaging and cloning, under the GNU General Public License (GPL) Version 2. Three types of Clonezilla are available, Clonezilla live, Clonezilla lite server, and Clonezilla SE (server edition). Clonezilla live is suitable for single machine backup and restore, and Clonezilla lite server or SE is for massive deployment, and can clone 40 plus computers simultaneously.
$0
OpenText AccuRev
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
AccuRev, a software configuration management offering, is now owned and supported by Micro Focus since the December 2013 acquisition, and now by OpenText.N/A
Pricing
ClonezillaOpenText AccuRev
Editions & Modules
Clonezilla live
$0
Clonezilla lite server
$0
Clonezilla SE (Server Edition)
$0
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ClonezillaOpenText AccuRev
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ClonezillaOpenText AccuRev
Best Alternatives
ClonezillaOpenText AccuRev
Small Businesses
Macrium Reflect
Macrium Reflect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Acronis True Image
Acronis True Image
Score 8.6 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ClonezillaOpenText AccuRev
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ClonezillaOpenText AccuRev
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
CloneZilla has several scenarios where it can be used in business. Firstly the main purpose for us is for imaging of larger number of systems with varying specifications and operating systems in quick succession. However we have also used it for "point of time" imaging of systems for when employees have left the company or have a full metal backup made.
Read full review
OpenText
Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • The ability to quickly setup imaging servers to rapidly increase the number of systems imaged.
  • Handling large numbers of device imaging off a single live server instance
  • Ability to run the server side of things on low end hardware
Read full review
OpenText
  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • The interface is not easy to navigate or understand by non technical staff
  • Many many key presses before an actual image starts processing
  • Does not feel "clean" - in that it feels very batch driven rather than having a more simpler way of managing the process end to end.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
Whilst other imaging and deployment suites provide nicer interfaces which suit less technical staff, they do have quite significant price differences in comparison to CloneZilla. CloneZilla not only provides us a significant number of features, it provides a full imaging solution at a price which no one can compete with!
Read full review
OpenText
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • CloneZilla provides us a very cheap solution for imaging of systems in our business
  • It has allowed us to rapidly increase our ability to image more systems across multiple locations
  • CloneZilla has allowed us to adapt and evolve our imaging environment to handle lots of different scenarios with little issues
Read full review
OpenText
  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Read full review
ScreenShots