CloudApper Facilities vs. Primavera Unifier

Being a facilities management app, it is best utilized in a facility that needs to maintain a lot of assets. This can be regular offices, factories and warehouses. Field-based teams will not benefit from this app, nor will remote employees. Overall, the app is quite good at doing what it says, and providing notifications.

Well suited: Used for construction domain for management of multiple vendors and sites. Used in cost management in energy domain company Not suited for: Partner users- once the company is inactive, all users will be inactive.

Incentivized

• Overall experience of using this software is highly satisfactory
• Helpful in tracking and viewing the location on assets
• Easy work order management
• The report module is very powerful; you can generate very insightful reports with it

• Submittals
• RFI's
• Change Management

Incentivized

• UI
• UX
• Tutorials

• Allowing to hyperlink within Unifier.
• Ability to paste from Excel into Unifier.
• The need for a modern design look and feel.

Incentivized

They are almost similar, but the ability to customize the app in CloudApper is something really useful. You can customize the app to meet your individual business needs and the price is also very affordable. Imagine having access to all the apps you need for $10 a month.

It is more user friendly , easy in cost management, good for integrating with multiple tools as data sources

• ROI increase
• Asset management transparency
• Audits

• In my organization, multiple companies like Metrolinx are using, and business is increasing day by day.
• Energy domain company like GE wind is using it now to manage their new project in sea wind installation.
• Used BI reports user defined reports, and custom reports to get data from multiple sources.

Incentivized