Akamai CloudTest vs. LoadComplete

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudTest
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Akamai now owns and supports CloudTest, a load and performance testing solution, developed by SOASTA and acquired with the company in 2017.N/A
LoadComplete
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.
$287
one-time fee
Pricing
Akamai CloudTestLoadComplete
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription Starter
$239
per month 100 virtual users
On-demand Starter
$287
one-time fee 100 virtual users
Subscription Pro
$699
per month 1000 virtual users
On-demand Pro
$887
one-time fee 1000 virtual users
Subscription Premium
$899
per month 2500 virtual users
On-demand Premium
$1,139
one-time fee 2500 virtual users
Enterprise
Let's chat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudTestLoadComplete
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—On-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Akamai CloudTestLoadComplete
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Akamai CloudTestLoadComplete
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Akamai CloudTest
7.2
1 Ratings
16% below category average
LoadComplete
8.2
5 Ratings
3% below category average
End to end performance management6.01 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Integrated performance data8.01 Ratings9.54 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.01 Ratings6.95 Ratings
Real time monitoring6.01 Ratings7.95 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection7.01 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Akamai CloudTestLoadComplete
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Akamai CloudTestLoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Akamai CloudTestLoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
Akamai
We were designing an Airlines reservation system, where we wanted to check the maximum number if reservation our system can handle, this tool helped us to get the test results but the issue was from set up point of view, the initial set up took too much time. But we were able to achieve our Reservation system process.
Read full review
SmartBear
If you are testing an application and you don't have experience in performance testing, this tool will help you to test the load with some documentation help. It's very easy to use. and if you have complex scenarios to determine the coding and adjusting graphs, the LoadComplete will not be a helpful tool for you.
Read full review
Pros
Akamai
  • Integration Call's like REST
  • Integration Call's like SOAP
  • Performance Testing
  • Load Testing on Load Balancer
Read full review
SmartBear
  • We have been using LoadComplete in the Tech Department. I usually use LoadComplete to test the speed and loads of several applications we develop in-house.
  • Moreover, we have also used LoadComplete to create reports and at the same time report any issues that we notice during a certain load.
  • It is an affordable platform.
  • LoadComplete has a lot of good features which has made my life so much easier so there are many pros of this tool as well. It is quite easy to use and comes in very handy.
Read full review
Cons
Akamai
  • Report generation is difficult
  • Some graphs are not displaying accurate results
  • More information are missing with respect to load testing
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Slow when the size of tests increase
  • Coding is not possible
  • Need to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on needs
Read full review
Usability
Akamai
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options.
Read full review
Support Rating
Akamai
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Akamai
The bundle of features that other tools provide is much higher when compared to the one provided by Akamai CloudTest, this is something they need to focus on Priority. Most tools comes with default setup and ends to end testing scenario that can be covered, such as Regression testing. From Akamai CloudTest this is a missing features that can be added up soon.
Read full review
SmartBear
We chose loadcomplete because we already use SmartBear software for other automation solutions. Porting over test cases is easy and a user can have a test up and running within minutes. I do wish SmartBear would have better support and I haven't used any other testing tool in a while to make a comparison.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Akamai
  • System Hangs as where severe load testing is required
  • Authentication is an issue when using OAUTH
  • Scalability can be improved and also an on premise tool can be of great help
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Many built-in features (like auto data correlation, load distributing etc) will save time for development.
Read full review
ScreenShots