Codacy vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Codacy | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis… | $0 |
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management. | $2.50 per user/per month |
| Codacy | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 96% Would buy again 157 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 99% Delivers good value for the price 146 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 95% Happy with the feature set 155 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 130 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Implementation went as expected 140 Answers | |
| Codacy | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Codacy | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.4 |
| Usability | - | 8.6 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.3 |
| Configurability | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.1 |
| Codacy | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Codacy Screenshots | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots |














