Code Compare vs. Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Code Compare
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Code Compare is a compare tool designed to compare and merge differing files and folders. Code Compare integrates with source control systems: TFS, SVN, Git, Mercurial, and Perforce. Code Compare is shipped both as a standalone file diff tool and a Visual Studio extension.N/A
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Redgate's SQL Toolbelt Essentials includes industry-standard tools for SQL Server development & deployment, enabling users to include SQL Server databases in agile processes and enabilng developers to embed robust and scalable development practices.
$1,209
per year per user (1-4 users)
Pricing
Code CompareRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Code CompareRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Code CompareRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Code CompareRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Code CompareRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.6
(13 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
Code CompareRedgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials
Likelihood to Recommend
Devart
If your developer team is well-versed with standard VCS then I don't think they need this additional software to occupy their memory, they already have those capabilities within all VCS. A well-suited use case can be a team where not everybody has knowledge of VCS but has to collaborate on a project.
Read full review
Redgate
We use SQL Compare to troubleshoot performance problems quite a bit since our data model is more like a template and not everything is 100% in sync and customization occurs between different client databases. We continually get pulled into performance issues and the developers will say Client A is performing different than Client B, why? Using SQL Compare, we usually find that one client was tuned and had indexes altered or added that weren't deployed to all clients or other objects weren't deployed correctly during the release. On the other hand, since our data model practices allow client databases to drift I tried to create a new golden image by trying to compare multiple databases based on the same data model and found it to be a very difficult process to complete using SQL Compare. SQL Compare gave me too much information and doesn't allow enough filtering to eliminate a lot of the noise.
Read full review
Pros
Devart
  • Easy to compare files and folders as it provides many features to set different colors while matching.
  • Easy to sync local clones with the production system.
  • It allows to user to compare the file within multiple windows.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Simple and easy comparison of database schemas and data. Differences can be copied or synced from one database to another with a click of a button.
  • You can save "projects" so that you can easily rerun a previous comparison whenever you need to.
  • It has a very simple, easy to learn interface. I've never needed to read any documentation or watch any tutorials in order to figure out how to do something.
Read full review
Cons
Devart
  • Dark mode would have been a welcome change.
  • UI could be updated to latest standard rather than old windows square looking UI.
  • Despite being simple to use, a user guide would be appreciated.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Pricing.... I wish there was an inexpensive developer version I could buy for myself.
  • Portability.... I would like to use it from a flash drive so I can use it where ever I am asked to work.
  • Unbundled.... This may be available already but I dont' recall I can buy it cheaply as a stand-alone product. Its only part of the bundle - cost effectively.
Read full review
Usability
Devart
No answers on this topic
Redgate
It's a good tool to have, but becomes expensive to buy a user license for each developer.
Read full review
Support Rating
Devart
No answers on this topic
Redgate
They have a great community website where you can search for answers but are also very responsive when it comes to direct support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Devart
No answers on this topic
Redgate
I've used Visual Studio Database Projects for this type of work in the past with some success, but Redgate SQL Compare is faster, more transparent, and simply easier to use. Faster is self explanatory. More transparent, means that it's much easier to set up your desired options for schema change deployment scripts. Easier to use, It's really dead simple. Start a project, connect your source, connect destination, click compare.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Devart
  • It helps to save a lot of effort hours as we can synch code with few simple steps.
  • Easily to check customers issues with the help of local and production changes.
  • Helps to deploy the service packs on a production system.
Read full review
Redgate
  • Makes deployment fairly simple. Cutting our deployment time down.
  • With the SDK, we can customize our deployment process very quickly and easily.
  • History is not great, it does create scripts you can go back and see but it would be nice to have a quicker version view by object to save time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Code Compare Screenshots

Screenshot of