Codemagic vs. Tricentis qTest
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Codemagic | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Codemagic is a developer's CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity, and Flutter projects on Codemagic. Codemagic uses its own CLI tools under the hood to perform complicated tasks like code signing and distribution to the stores. These are open-sourced and available on Github. Codemagic offers pay as you go pricing for teams as well as an all-inclusive option with an unlimited plan (called the professional plan). Codemagic is used… | $0 |
Tricentis qTest | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018. | $1,200 per year per user |
| Codemagic | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Professional plans available for $299/month. Perfect for teams who need fixed costs. This includes: Unlimited premium macOS VM minutes Unlimited premium Linux VM minutes Unlimited premium Windows VM minutes Teams with unlimited users 3 concurrent builds In-app support | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Codemagic | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Would buy again 31 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 84% Delivers good value for the price 26 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 37 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Implementation went as expected 27 Answers | |
| Codemagic | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Codemagic | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Gradle Build Tool (Open Source) Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Codemagic | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.7 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 1.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.0 |
| Codemagic | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Tricentis qTest Screenshots |








