CoderPad vs. Mercer Mettl Coding Assessments

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoderPad
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
CoderPad is a technical interview platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco, ideally used by development teams to enable a quick, accurate read on a candidate's skills through the hiring process. According to the vendor, CoderPad works like an IDE to help candidates share their skills and ensure the interviewer understands how the candidate works. The platform supports collaborative coding sessions and take-home assignments.
$50
per month
Mercer Mettl Coding Assessments
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Mercer | Mettl's Integrated Coding Assessment Platform, along with its suite of digital tools (categorized as Mercer | Mettl Hack) is used to hire and develop the best coders and build high performing coding teams. Mercer Mettl Hack aims to enable organizations to hire, skill and engage coding talent.…N/A
Pricing
CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
Editions & Modules
Personal
$50
per month (5 interviews)
Team
$250
per month (30 interviews)
Business
$750
per month (90 interviews)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details$15/interview for overagesCustomized Pricing as per the client's requirement
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
Best Alternatives
CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
Likelihood to Recommend
CoderPad
- To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.
Read full review
Mercer Mettl
It is well suited for doing a pre screening of candidates on certain assessments. Whenever you post a requirement, you get lot of applications, so the initial screening on the technical skills can be done by giving them a skilled assessment, which will help us to filter candidates better and this also saves the time of the actual interviews as they would get better screened candidates.
Read full review
Pros
CoderPad
  • Large range of supported languages
  • Code runs quickly
  • Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee
Read full review
Mercer Mettl
  • Coding challenges selection based on skill sets
  • MCQ selection from the library based on skill sets
  • Adding marks for each question
  • Ordering the questions in the assessment
Read full review
Cons
CoderPad
  • Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
  • Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
  • A transparent and publicly available pricing
Read full review
Mercer Mettl
  • Improve more library questions
  • Provide ease to add additional questions
  • Integration with other tools
Read full review
Usability
CoderPad
CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.
Read full review
Mercer Mettl
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CoderPad
We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.
Read full review
Mercer Mettl
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
CoderPad
  • 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
  • Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
  • The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts
Read full review
Mercer Mettl
  • It helped us to pre screen candidates based on their skill sets
  • Helps to reduce time in talent hiring
  • Helps to streamline your talent process
  • Reduces wastage of time of the interviewer by giving them proper pre screened candidates
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mercer Mettl Coding Assessments Screenshots

Screenshot of Interview PlatformScreenshot of Mercer Mettl I/OScreenshot of Pre-built Test Library