TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CoderPad vs. Mercer Mettl Coding Assessments

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CoderPad

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/ACoderPad is a technical interview platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco, ideally used by development teams to enable a quick, accurate read on a candidate's skills through the hiring process. According to the vendor, CoderPad works like an IDE to help candidates share their skills and ensure the interviewer understands how the candidate works. The platform supports collaborative coding sessions and take-home assignments.

    $50

    per month

    Mercer Mettl Coding Assessments

    Score9 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Mercer | Mettl's Integrated Coding Assessment Platform, along with its suite of digital tools (categorized as Mercer | Mettl Hack) is used to hire and develop the best coders and build high performing coding teams. Mercer Mettl Hack aims to enable organizations to hire, skill and engage coding talent.…N/A
    Pricing
    CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
    Editions & Modules
    Personal
    $50
    per month (5 interviews)
    Team
    $250
    per month (30 interviews)
    Business
    $750
    per month (90 interviews)
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details$15/interview for overagesCustomized Pricing as per the client's requirement
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Renaissance Accelerated Reader
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Renaissance Accelerated Reader
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Renaissance Accelerated Reader
    Score9.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.8
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CoderPadMercer Mettl Coding Assessments
    Likelihood to Recommend
    CoderPad
    - To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mercer Mettl
    It is well suited for doing a pre screening of candidates on certain assessments. Whenever you post a requirement, you get lot of applications, so the initial screening on the technical skills can be done by giving them a skilled assessment, which will help us to filter candidates better and this also saves the time of the actual interviews as they would get better screened candidates.
    Read full review
    Pros
    CoderPad
    • Large range of supported languages
    • Code runs quickly
    • Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mercer Mettl
    • Coding challenges selection based on skill sets
    • MCQ selection from the library based on skill sets
    • Adding marks for each question
    • Ordering the questions in the assessment
    Read full review
    Cons
    CoderPad
    • Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
    • Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
    • A transparent and publicly available pricing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mercer Mettl
    • Improve more library questions
    • Provide ease to add additional questions
    • Integration with other tools
    Read full review
    Usability
    CoderPad
    CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mercer Mettl
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    CoderPad
    We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mercer Mettl
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    CoderPad
    • 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
    • Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
    • The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Mercer Mettl
    • It helped us to pre screen candidates based on their skill sets
    • Helps to reduce time in talent hiring
    • Helps to streamline your talent process
    • Reduces wastage of time of the interviewer by giving them proper pre screened candidates
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Mercer Mettl Coding Assessments Screenshots

    Screenshot of Interview PlatformScreenshot of Mercer Mettl I/OScreenshot of Pre-built Test Library