CodeSignal vs. TestInvite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CodeSignal
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
CodeSignal is a technical skills assessment platform that enables companies to quickly hire qualified candidates for technical roles. With over 70 coding languages and tools and a built in plagiarism checker, companies can be confident that the candidates they select will be successful in their new roles.N/A
TestInvite
Score 8.3 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
TestInvite provides tools to design and deliver tailored online exams with security. TestInvite's library of pre-made hiring tests streamlines assessment creation, or users can bring their own tests. Systematic question randomization, customizable time limits, navigation restrictions, and secure screen-locking combat cheating behavior. Advanced anti-cheating features, including proctoring and webcam and screen monitoring, uphold exam integrity and ensure the…
$450
per year
Pricing
CodeSignalTestInvite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pay as you go
$450
per year 2000 testing credits included
Essential
$948
per year 2000 testing credits included
Advanced
$1908
per year 2000 testing credits included
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CodeSignalTestInvite
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$1 per seat
Additional DetailsContact vendor for a demo and for custom pricing options.Test Invite is an online exam software is built for organizations of any size. The "pay as you go" plan and credit system enable companies to use the system when they have just needed online exam processes without any recurring payment plans.
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
CodeSignalTestInvite
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CodeSignalTestInvite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(115 ratings)
8.3
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(6 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.1
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CodeSignalTestInvite
Likelihood to Recommend
CodeSignal
I think code signal is one of the best platforms for organizations to better test the resource for their coding skills. Its way of conducting the test saves engineering time, reduces the risks that hiring companies have in technical interviews, and provides a cheating-free environment. The platform can be improved to make the new learners practice well on the platform and get used to it.
Read full review
Test Invite
Our needs are really well met by Test Invite. Of particular note is the fact that Test Invite provides contemporary methods to assess the knowledge and skills of the test takers. In our field, it is imperative to understand the oral language skills of potential students. With the use of video and audio recording supported questions, we can gain more insight into our students' needs so that we can tailor our services to them better. For language testing, Test Invite really allows the school to reliably collect, analyze and report on essential data needed from students. There are some usability issues with the platform, however, Test Invite has been working diligently to improve on these areas and add additional functionality.
Read full review
Pros
CodeSignal
  • The test cases are quite well-written, and the grade we earn as a result of them is very fair. Users can use a unit testing tool to perform their own unit testing, allowing them to double-check their code before submitting it.
  • Intensive technical interview preparation
  • The online evaluation option is an excellent approach to assess candidates.
  • Simple UI for Simple Operations
Read full review
Test Invite
  • Cognitive aptitude assessments.
  • Providing assessment platform.
  • Providing support during assessment activities.
  • English proficiency testing.
Read full review
Cons
CodeSignal
  • The platform should provide candidates with detailed feedback, allowing them to identify areas for improvement if necessary.
  • Furthermore, despite the fact that the assessment is complete, the platform prioritizes speed. In order to finish the assignment on time, people may be forced to forgo quality or desired output.
  • They should improve the question selection procedure, as some of the questions are too long to finish in the allocated time.
Read full review
Test Invite
  • More training videos on specific functionalities
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
CodeSignal
I give it this rating because it is very easy to use. Not only that it is proctored and trusted. Moreover, the candidates find it easy to use given that it is a single test. This means that we get much more applications than using other platforms. This helps us to hire better faster and easier with codesignal.
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Usability
CodeSignal
It's very straightfoward to use and simple. For our use case in coding interviews, we generate a link, give it to the candidate and we never got any complaints or questions asked, they were able to follow our scenarios perfectly.
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
CodeSignal
Yes, the staff has been very quick
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Performance
CodeSignal
Yes, pages load quickly, reports comes in a reasonable time frame, only when CodeSIgnal integrates, it provide small glitches.
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
CodeSignal
I am not sure whether or not they have replaced but surely emerged as a big competitor. Their support system should be good knowing that they are in completion with the best hackerrank. I feel they could do a much better job but I have not used their support much
Read full review
Test Invite
This is the most appreciated part of working with Test Invite over the last 2 years. Support was always timely, congenial, effective, and never challenging in terms of response rate or quality of reaction. Our counterpart on the Test Invite side has practically become a member of our team, as they are always extremely involved and ready to provide value while becoming very clear on our needs.
Read full review
In-Person Training
CodeSignal
It has clear details for every staff to understand the basic, and staffs can communicate efficiently to provide strong backgrounds. Also, the manager who provided this training has collaborated well with the Codesignal staff so that everyone could learn more about CodeSignal and look at it from different users' perspectives. So the training was really helpful
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Online Training
CodeSignal
There were some issues with the compiler
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
CodeSignal
It just works
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CodeSignal
Codesignal provides features like screen recording and monitors candidates while they take the assessments, thereby reducing the possibility of cheating during the assessment, which is a known problem with other providers like HackerRank. Codesignal also provides predictive coding scores, which helps to better assess the capabilities of the candidates.
Read full review
Test Invite
I selected Test Invite because it was the only provider I found whose question format types and customization options fully allowed us to digitalize our placement tests and conduct them online. The availability of video and audio options in questions is a clear advantage.
Read full review
Scalability
CodeSignal
It works on multiple departments.
Read full review
Test Invite
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
CodeSignal
  • It has been advantageous in terms of saving time for our interviewees due to its simpler approach.
  • My coding abilities have greatly improved and continue to aid me in the interviews process.
  • The User Interface has caused me to spend more time on this application and has prompted me to discover new and more productive development techniques.
Read full review
Test Invite
  • I think they're incredibly supportive and flexible for a growing business
Read full review
ScreenShots

CodeSignal Screenshots

Screenshot of candidate evaluation using languages, frameworks, and tools unique to the job including JavaScript, Python, PHP, React, Ruby, and SwiftScreenshot of a live remote and on-site interview using CodeSignal's pair programming solution with high definition video and CodeSignal's advanced IDE environment.Screenshot of an analysis of a large volume of assessments.

TestInvite Screenshots

Screenshot of Question bankScreenshot of real-time proctoringScreenshot of test creationScreenshot of test previewScreenshot of test previewScreenshot of personality inventory