ComplySci vs. SAP Process Control

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ComplySci
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
ComplySci is a provider of regulatory technology solutions that help compliance professionals identify, manage and report on employee conflicts of interests and compliance risk activities, including personal trading, political contributions, and other violations. Founded in 2003, ComplySci develops automated compliance management solutions and boasts users among over 1,400 customers, including some of the worlds largest financial institutions.N/A
SAP Process Control
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
SAP Process Control Simplifies uses continuous control monitoring, and streamlined testing, and reduces risk with real-time insight into control status and key issues. It can be deployed on premise or in the cloud.N/A
Pricing
ComplySciSAP Process Control
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ComplySciSAP Process Control
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ComplySciSAP Process Control
Considered Both Products
ComplySci

No answer on this topic

SAP Process Control
Chose SAP Process Control
The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes …
Chose SAP Process Control
The strongest area is the native capability to connect to SAP applications to extract and analyze configuration and transactional data. AuditBoard and ServiceNow have better reporting/dashboard capabilities which offer better user experience. In addition, out of the box SAP …
Chose SAP Process Control
SAP Process Control is more integrated into SAP products which reduces customization, unlike other products like access violation management from greenlight. Other products like sailpoint are available in products to monitor similar functionality but are to be more customized …
Features
ComplySciSAP Process Control
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
ComplySci
7.3
Ratings
1% below category average
SAP Process Control
7.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Common repository of GRC items6.40 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Risk management8.20 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems7.30 Ratings5.00 Ratings
GRC policy management7.30 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Incident management7.30 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ComplySciSAP Process Control
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ComplySciSAP Process Control
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ComplySciSAP Process Control
Likelihood to Recommend
Any regulated firm where monitoring of outside accounts is required.
Read full review
SAP Process Control is well suited for managing the end to end lifecycle of controls across different regulations. When managing a risk and controls framework it is better suited for public companies that have regulation requirements. The tool does not offer good capabilities for managing robust IT regulations. It would be good if there's improvement to the tool so it can be used to manage IT assets.
Read full review
Pros
  • Monitor all trading activity and report transactions not approved
  • Provide detail reports on individual trading activity and approvals received
Read full review
  • Workflows - The workflows of SAP Process Control are extremely helpful
  • Reporting - Standard reports as well as the connection to SAP AC is very helpful
  • Continuous Control Monitoring is the way to go in ICS Topics in the future.
  • Handling of users - Assignment and Replacements
  • Spot Checks - Helpful workflows and setup
Read full review
Cons
  • Monitoring other platforms if accounts are opened at other firms for the same individuals registered with the current firm.
Read full review
  • Integrated attachments functionality (i.e., edit Word/Excel documents within SAP PC, rather than having to download the files locally)
  • More flexible dashboarding capabilities
  • Better out of the box reporting
  • No out of the box content for Controls, Regulations
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes helped us with the decision to implement SAP Process Control.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Significant control on risks
  • Significant savings on audit testing can be achieved
  • Automation of risk management has a lot of audit standardization and confidence in compliance
  • Reliability of automated controls reduces time vested in testing the standard controls
Read full review
ScreenShots