Concrete CMS vs. dotCMS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concrete CMS | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Concrete CMS (formerly Concrete5) is a free and open source, PHP built content management system for content on the web and also for intranets. It is optimized to support the creation of online magazines and newspapers. | N/A |
dotCMS | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | dotCMS is a Java open-source content management system for companies that demand performance in web operations and content management. With dotCMS, companies can create value and deliver dynamic user experiences across multiple channels. The solution is built on open standards: JSON, XML, REST, Spring, OSGI and CMIS. The vendor says it is extensible and massively scalable, and can help companies rapidly deliver personalized, engaging content across devices, channels, second screens… | $0 |
| Concrete CMS | dotCMS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pricing is per server. One server equals one JVM. There is no limit on users, seats, or web sites. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Concrete CMS | dotCMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Concrete CMS | dotCMS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform & Infrastructure |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Creation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Concrete CMS | dotCMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Umbraco CMS Score7 out of 10 | Umbraco CMS Score7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Square Online Score7.8 out of 10 | Square Online Score7.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | RWS Tridion Sites Score9 out of 10 | RWS Tridion Sites Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Concrete CMS | dotCMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.1 | - |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.8 | - |
| Concrete CMS | dotCMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Concrete CMS Screenshots | dotCMS Screenshots |










