Viewpoint eDiscovery, from Conduent vs. Relativity

In cases involving massive datasets (I.e. regulatory investigations, cross-border litigation), Relativity's powerful search, deduplication, and technology-assisted review features enable fast, accurate identification of relevant documents. For example, we used it in a front-running investigation involving a large asset management firm, where Relativity streamlined data review across multiple custodians. There are multiple use case available.

Incentivized

• Searching for documents and native files with various terms and approaches.
• Tagging documents and native files for further review.
• Creating and downloading collections of documents and native files for depositions.

Incentivized

• Very powerful tool, but does require a high level of expertise and head count to administer the product.
• If hosting yourself, requires investment in servers and ideally is housed in a data center
• Providers need to pay kCura a monthly user license fee for every user who has access to the tool. Providers can purchase blocks of users, but with a large amount of users on a case, it's cost that some external clients are not thrilled about

Incentivized

Relativity is a well established tool that continues to evolve and look for ways to improve. Particular focus on Australian workflows is very promising for us and appreciated. There is a lot of scope for improvement in the processing and PDF workflows but it is great to see Relativity being proactive in those areas

Incentivized

Relativity contains all the features together in a single platform. And most of all other than Brainspace none of the other tools have document review capability as good as Relativity has.

Incentivized

• Saves time spent searching for documents and native files.
• Easy to download materials when needed.
• Can share collections of materials across team members in other offices.

Incentivized