CONTENTdm vs. NetX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CONTENTdm
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
CONTENTdm is a DAM for libraries, from OCLC headquartered in Dublin, Ohio.N/A
NetX
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
NetX, NetXposure, Inc headquartered in Portland, offers their eponymous Digital Asset Management platform, boasting an onboarding team has more than a decade of experience in DAM, which allows them to tailor NetX to meet specific needs and timeline, and the ability to make future changes to a team's workflows.N/A
Pricing
CONTENTdmNetX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CONTENTdmNetX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CONTENTdmNetX
Best Alternatives
CONTENTdmNetX
Small Businesses
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CONTENTdmNetX
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CONTENTdmNetX
Likelihood to Recommend
OCLC
CONTENTdm is well-suited for smaller organizations as a simple solution to present a digital collection on the web. If your need is complex and requires digital preservation as part of the workflow, it may not be the best solution.
Read full review
NetXposure, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Pros
OCLC
  • Constant URLs
  • User interface is good
  • Run by OCLC, not likely to disappear
Read full review
NetXposure, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Cons
OCLC
  • As a digital asset management system, one would expect the capability of managing preservation, which CONTENTdm lacks.
  • Lack of batch updating and other advanced metadata management capabilities.
  • The usage statistics does not work, and the company is not planning to fix it, at least based the interaction with tech support staff. Customers were referred to use Google Analytics.
Read full review
NetXposure, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OCLC
We selected CONTENTdm because it had a good reputation, was used by many institutions, provided a good product, and supplied feedback and monthly reports. We are wondering about DPLA and if that will be the next evolution or platform.
Read full review
NetXposure, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OCLC
  • It helped us to get started with our digital collections projects at a relatively low cost.
  • As our needs grew, it became apparent that we needed something more powerful, and that provides better workflows and better statistics and is able to handle the whole life cycle of digitation projects.
Read full review
NetXposure, Inc.
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots