Contentful vs. Hygraph

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentful
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Contentful is a cloud based CMS solution that provides the ability to manage content across multiple platforms.The editing interface allows for managing content interactively and provides developers the ability to deliver the content with the programming language and template framework of their choice.
$489
Hygraph
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month
Pricing
ContentfulHygraph
Editions & Modules
Team
489/month
Community
Free
Enterprise
Custom
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentfulHygraph
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details—35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentfulHygraph
Considered Both Products
Contentful

No answer on this topic

Hygraph
Chose Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
ContentfulHygraph
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
7.3
8 Ratings
11% below category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
8.0
9 Ratings
5% above category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
API8.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
7.7
10 Ratings
0% below category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section8.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Form generator7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
8.0
9 Ratings
8% above category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy8.08 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO support7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
-
Ratings
Hygraph
8.7
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Collaborative editing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Content templates00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Approval and authoring workflows00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ContentfulHygraph
Small Businesses
Divi
Divi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentfulHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(10 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentfulHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
Contentful
Contentful is well suited for folks who want a simple, clean, easy-to-use interface for a JAVASCRIPT website. If you do not want a javascript website you should look [elsewhere].
Read full review
Hygraph
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
Read full review
Pros
Contentful
  • Clean, modern interface (not clunky and outdated, like WordPress)
  • High degree of flexibility (I can structure data any way my clients need)
  • Enables headless frontend (i.e. I can build any frontend I want without having to change my CMS)
Read full review
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
  • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
  • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
Read full review
Cons
Contentful
  • The new Contentful "branches" feature looked promising (it appears to mirror a git-like repository) but it requires the CLI, which isn't necessarily practical for teams that aren't current CLI users. It would be nice if the management of this feature were available via the UI (without that it causes more confusion than anything).
  • The Contentful data modeling method makes for a bit of an awkward SDK developer experience in some strongly typed languages like Java. Most things that you might need can be accomplished, but it feels like the experience could be smoother.
  • It would be nice if there were a way to migrate data between spaces (e.g. from your staging space to production).
Read full review
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
  • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
  • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Contentful
Easy to use and much more organized as a single platform versus multi. The layout is clean and easy to read and we don’t have to worry about certain users safe guarding data or content then losing it when they leave the company. It’s a one stop shop for imagery
Read full review
Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
Read full review
Return on Investment
Contentful
  • There was no negative impact as such.
  • Positive impact is increase in sales.
  • More work is delivered due to reusability and other features within a time and less manual effort.
Read full review
Hygraph
  • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
  • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
  • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Contentful Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of