Control-M vs. IBM File Transfer Service
Control-M vs. IBM File Transfer Service
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control-M | N/A | Control-M from BMC is a platform for integrating, automating, and orchestrating application and data workflows in production across complex hybrid technology ecosystems. It provides deep operational capabilities, delivering speed, scale, security, and governance. | N/A | |
IBM File Transfer Service | N/A | IBM® File Transfer Service is a cloud-based managed file transfer solution for business-to-business (B2B) interactions. It is used to manage a single, security-rich, highly reliable connection between a business and its partners. File Transfer Service offers an alternative to more expensive on-premises software while helping to reduce the operational impact on technology staff. | N/A |
Control-M | IBM File Transfer Service | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Control-M | IBM File Transfer Service | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
Control-M | IBM File Transfer Service | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workload Automation |
|
Control-M | IBM File Transfer Service | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | DataMotion Score 8.9 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Apache Airflow Score 8.5 out of 10 | DataMotion Score 8.9 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Redwood RunMyJobs Score 9.4 out of 10 | Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT Score 5.9 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Control-M | IBM File Transfer Service | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 (51 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 8.3 (6 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 9.1 (6 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 6.4 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 9.1 (8 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 8.3 (5 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Control-M | IBM File Transfer Service | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Pros | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Cons | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Usability | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Performance | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Scalability | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | BMC Software Inc. | IBM No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots |