Convertize vs. Firebase

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Convertize
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Convertize headquartered in London offers their A/B testing solution.
$49
20,000 visitors per month
Firebase
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Firebase suite of application development tools, available free or at cost for higher degree of usages, priced flexibly accorded to features needed. The suite includes A/B testing and Crashlytics, Cloud Messaging (FCM) and in-app messaging, cloud storage and NoSQL storage (Cloud Firestore and Firestore Realtime Database), and other features supporting developers with flexible mobile application development.
$0.01
Per Verification
Pricing
ConvertizeFirebase
Editions & Modules
Solo
$49
20,000 visitors per month
Team
$199
100,000 visitors per month
Team
$329
500,000 visitors per month
Team
$499
1,000,000 visitors/month
Team
$829
2,000,000 visitors per month
Phone Authentication
$0.01
Per Verification
Stored Data
$0.18
Per GiB
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConvertizeFirebase
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConvertizeFirebase
Features
ConvertizeFirebase
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Convertize
8.9
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Firebase
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Convertize
8.0
1 Ratings
9% below category average
Firebase
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Convertize
6.3
1 Ratings
31% below category average
Firebase
-
Ratings
Goal tracking7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ConvertizeFirebase
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.9 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.9 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ConvertizeFirebase
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
4.3
(29 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
4.3
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
ConvertizeFirebase
Likelihood to Recommend
Glassbox
For startups that want to experiment with their landing page, I think Convertize is great. Especially if your team doesn't have time to build a solution yourself. One of the best things, in my opinion, is that it can be used by non-tech people, such as a marketing department and so on.
Read full review
Google
Firebase should be your first choice if your platform is mobile first. Firebase's mobile platform support for client-side applications is second to none, and I cannot think of a comparable cross-platform toolkit. Firebase also integrates well with your server-side solution, meaning that you can plug Firebase into your existing app architecture with minimal effort.
Firebase lags behind on the desktop, however. Although macOS support is rapidly catching up, full Windows support is a glaring omission for most Firebase features. This means that if your platform targets Windows, you will need to implement the client functionality manually using Firebase's web APIs and wrappers, or look for another solution.
Read full review
Pros
Glassbox
No answers on this topic
Google
  • Analytics wise, retention is extremely important to our app, therefore we take advantage of the cohort analysis to see the impact of our middle funnel (retargeting, push, email) efforts affect the percent of users that come back into the app. Firebase allows us to easily segment these this data and look at a running average based on certain dates.
  • When it comes to any mobile app, a deep linking strategy is essential to any apps success. With Firebase's Dynamic Links, we are able to share dynamic links (recognize user device) that are able to redirect to in-app content. These deep links allow users to share other deep-linked content with friends, that also have link preview assets.
  • Firebase allows users to effectively track events, funnels, and MAUs. With this simple event tracking feature, users can put organize these events into funnels of their main user flows (e.g., checkout flows, onboarding flows, etc.), and subsequently be able to understand where the drop-off is in the funnel and then prioritize areas of the funnel to fix. Also, MAU is important to be able to tell if you are bringing in new users and what's the active volume for each platform (Android, iOS).
Read full review
Cons
Glassbox
No answers on this topic
Google
  • Attribution and specifically multi-touch attribution could be more robust such as Branch or Appsflyer but understand this isn't Firebases bread and butter.
  • More parameters. Firebase allows you to track tons of events (believe it's up to 50 or so) but the parameters of the events it only allows you to track 5 which is so messily and unbelievable. So you're able to get good high-level data but if you want to get granular with the events and actions are taken on your app to get real data insight you either have to go with a paid data analytics platform or bring on someone that's an expert in SQL to go through Big Query.
  • City-specific data instead of just country-specific data would have been a huge plus as well.
Read full review
Usability
Glassbox
No answers on this topic
Google
I don't use the Firebase UI much, but rather connect it to GA4. GA4 has a great event model but the GA4 UI and analysis capabilities are limited. It's harder to measure product usage type of engagement but if you have the time and resources to leverage the GA4 to BiqQuery export you'll have all the raw event data you'll need for deep analysis, segmentation, and audience activation.
Read full review
Support Rating
Glassbox
No answers on this topic
Google
Our analytics folks handled the majority of the communication when it came to customer service, but as far as I was aware, the support we got was pretty good. When we had an issue, we were able to reach out and get support in a timely fashion. Firebase was easy to reach and reasonably available to assist when needed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Glassbox
No answers on this topic
Google
Before using Firebase, we exclusively used self hosted database services. Using Firebase has allowed us to reduce reliance on single points of failure and systems that are difficult to scale. Additionally, Firebase is much easier to set up and use than any sort of self hosted database. This simplicity has allowed us to try features that we might not have based on the amount of work they required in the past.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Glassbox
No answers on this topic
Google
  • Makes building real-time interfaces easy to do at scale with no backend involvement.
  • Very low pricing for small companies and green-fields projects.
  • Lack of support for more complicated queries needs to be managed by users and often forces strange architecture choices for data to enable it to be easily accessed.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Convertize Screenshots

Screenshot of See at glance which variant is performing best in Convertize Analytics. The platform tells you when your test is significant.Screenshot of Convertize integrates with the tools you're already using