TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Copado

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACopado is a Salesforce-native DevOps platform that helps teams deliver software faster, with less risk and more confidence.N/A

    Tuskr

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ATuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.

    $45

    per month 5 users (minimum)

    Pricing
    CopadoTuskr
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Team
    $9
    per month per user
    Business
    $15
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    $29
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CopadoTuskr
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—16% discount for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CopadoTuskr
    Considered Both Products
    Copado Solutions
    No answer on this topic
    Celoxis
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    24 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    26 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    21 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    Features
    CopadoTuskr
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Copado and Tuskr
    Feature
    Copado
    -
    Ratings
    Tuskr
    9.7
    25 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.425 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CopadoTuskr
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure DevOps
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Azure DevOps Server
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CopadoTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.4
    (26 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.2
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CopadoTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Copado Solutions
    When we have a large organization and number of changes and deployments are more than we should go for Copado. As we know it is a paid managed package and the cost is high so for dealing with fewer deployments it is not preferable to buy. Copado is well suited for users who don't have much technical understanding. So those users can see the User interface select the changes that need to be deployed by selecting the metadata. From Git operation to deployment all is handled by Copado itself. Copado has reduced the efforts for creating the package.xml and direct deployments can be done within a few clicks. Another Major aspect is that it can be directly synced with Jira or Azzure board from where the user stories will be synced and actions can be performed accordingly. For small organization, Copado can be expensive and to set up and maintain we need a technical person to do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    Tuskr works well for teams that want a straightforward test management solution without a steep learning curve. It's especially useful for Agile projects where frequent testing and collaboration are important. Teams looking for extensive enterprise-level customization or highly advanced reporting may find some limitations, but for day-to-day QA management, it performs very well.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Copado Solutions
    • Capturing latest changes accurately in the commit window
    • Auto resolving conflicts
    • gate checks for apex code coverage.
    • Giving insights into the validation errors
    • very easy to migrate data & metadata between orgs, just with few clicks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
    • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
    • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Copado Solutions
    • In deployment, the Query can be lost when editing, which can cause a lot of problems.
    • The Query option is cumbersome, but it works!
    • The deployment instructions fields could be made into rich text fields which would be awesome.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
    • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
    • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Copado Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Celoxis
    Tuskr suits our organization needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Copado Solutions
    very good user interface. It has reduced tons of manual efforts for the developers. Very easy to validate the release work. Easy to club multiple stories into one deployment. We can integrate Copado with our JIRA and all the PR’s are visible under the user story on JIRA board. But this can be overwhelming for beginners
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    The Tuskr App, overall rating depends on its easeiest way to use as their features and managment tool are too good. If you need a easier tool and cost-effective tool and a lot of feature in it. and its return of investment is very good. And the software is really ease to adapt
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Copado Solutions
    There are tools such as ANT migration tool or using sfdx but Copado makes the deployments super simple. If a user is not that technically strong still he can use Copado and deploy the changes in a few clicks. Copado provides a complete package of maintaining the development and repositories in a common platform. There are pipelines that you can set that changes will move from which org to the final org in a very organized manner. We can perform static code analysis at the time of deployment of the changes and we have to clear those if we need to deploy the changes. Creating pull requests is super easy and can be managed by Copado itself. Overall a superb managed package for deployment in Salesforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Copado Solutions
    • It has reduced the efforts to create package.xml manually and deploy the changes
    • Another positive impact is that we can track the commits to which org they have reached in an organized way and we don't need to maintain them separately
    • For setting Copado it take a lot of time and training is required for the complete setup which is time-consuming
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
    • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
    • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tuskr Screenshots

    Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload