Copyleaks vs. Writer

My organization has been implementing this tool to make sure that each project and tasks we carry out is 100% unique and authentic, thanks to its excellent AI technology we can deepen and be sure that each project we carry out is original before being shared with other organizations , allows you to download your reports in PDF, which is excellent for later sharing with your clients and work team. It has the best LMS integrations such as Canvas, Sakai, Blackboard among others. There is really nothing inappropriate about it, as it can be used by both professionals and students.

Incentivized

Carrying out the quality control process allows me to carry out the organization, details [are] written instantly, and progress of the same as well as personalize them. Regarding the interface, I would change it for a more graphic one. On the other hand[,] writer navigates my content of complex documents and thus be able to have shortcuts[.]

Incentivized

• It is faster and more efficient.
• It's a Google plugin for quick and easy similarity checking.
• It's fully interactive with font selection, color highlighting, and more.
• As for the file format support, it is 99% and multi-file upload. With this, you can make detailed reports to check for plagiarism.

Incentivized

• Automated correction
• Words auto complete
• Writing Style

Incentivized

• It is not free, it only offers a limited period that restricts the number of words and pages that can be analyzed.
• In the trial period, do not allow access to functions available in its Premium version.

Incentivized

• There is some setup required to get your word lists in there, adjust your editing style, and set up typical errors, but otherwise it works similarly to other programs (but worth it in my opinion).
• Their web editor loses formatting, which several team members have complained about. However, formatting is properly retained in GDocs, Word, and the Chrome extension. There is some setup required to get your word lists in there, adjust your editing style, and set up typical errors, but otherwise it works similarly to other programs (but worth it in my opinion).
• I wish it were easy to provide solutions to complex problems rather than simply highlighting them.

Incentivized

They are ideal tools to show plagiarism results from different websites in different languages, showing the percentage of plagiarism or duplication. With the exception of PlagScan which is available only in English.

Incentivized

Grammarly is very advanced, but I use Writer as It offers me additional features like word count, a cleaner interface, and a word processor for taking notes.

Incentivized

• There were various difficulties with duplicate results that were incorrect and inadequate website crawling.
• It was handled and dealt with, but it occurred on a few occasions.
• This makes determining how much each document will cost to verify difficult.

Incentivized

• For its part Writer has built-in drawing tools, facilitating my work on new basic technological creations.
• It also has a complete equation editor when quantifying any report.
• But it has a limited group of Fonts and at the same time has a slow processing speed

Incentivized