WRITER Review
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use it to automate end to end training curation. WRITER's agents allow us to use our bespoke and proprietary context document backed by learning science to output a skills taxonomy, needs analysis, full granular curriculum, and actual learning assets. All of this is backed, contextualized, and synthesized by prompts, information, and resources that we curated in house.
Pros
- Referencing specific context documents
- Writing bespoke text-based content
- Clear and precise outputs based on specific prompts
- Quick outputs for small and medium prompts
- Very user-friendly client-facing interface
- A lot of QoL in terms of foldering and prompting are done in the client-facing interface
Cons
- The current agents have weird responses sometimes
- QOL Features for the admin-facing AI Studio part, specifically folder organization, labeling, etc.
- Can do a little more speed when referencing big documents, knowledge graphs, and complex prompts. It takes a couple of minutes sometimes, to answer.
Return on Investment
- Better design quality
- Faster learner speed to proficiency
- Improved client metrics
- Massive efficiencies on overall end-to-end training curation workflow
- Efficiencies resulted to dollar amount savings
Other Software Used
Mural, Kahoot!, Adobe Premiere Pro
