WRITER Review
September 30, 2025

WRITER Review

John Kevin Rembulat | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with WRITER

We use it to automate end to end training curation. WRITER's agents allow us to use our bespoke and proprietary context document backed by learning science to output a skills taxonomy, needs analysis, full granular curriculum, and actual learning assets. All of this is backed, contextualized, and synthesized by prompts, information, and resources that we curated in house.

Pros

  • Referencing specific context documents
  • Writing bespoke text-based content
  • Clear and precise outputs based on specific prompts
  • Quick outputs for small and medium prompts
  • Very user-friendly client-facing interface
  • A lot of QoL in terms of foldering and prompting are done in the client-facing interface

Cons

  • The current agents have weird responses sometimes
  • QOL Features for the admin-facing AI Studio part, specifically folder organization, labeling, etc.
  • Can do a little more speed when referencing big documents, knowledge graphs, and complex prompts. It takes a couple of minutes sometimes, to answer.
  • Better design quality
  • Faster learner speed to proficiency
  • Improved client metrics
  • Massive efficiencies on overall end-to-end training curation workflow
  • Efficiencies resulted to dollar amount savings
As explained, we are using bespoke context documents that teach the WRITER agents on how to do our end-to-end training workflow. This allows the action agent to understand our needs and champion learning science, effectiveness, and ultimately efficiency. With their RAG methodology, this impacted multiple internal and client metrics that allow us to be both efficient, and effective at what we do.
They are pretty standard and we are well aware about both their legal and technological standpoint for the AI guardrails, this gave us peace of mind that the data that we store inside the graph are solely and will stay at the 4 walls of our WRITER instance and will never be used to train the model.
I tried to find the learning platforms on your search bar but nothing returned. It's basically a contest on who can implement our company's training point of view in all of their training assets/workflows. None of the 5 companies can match what WRITER did. This is because we would be needing a blank canvass to paint our vision of what a perfect training looks like; the other platforms may or may not be open to some of the suggestions that we might IMMEDIATELY need; since WRITER is just a regular Full-Stack AI platform and we already pay for it; we did not need to find another solution for this and potentially saved hundred thousand dollars

Do you think WRITER delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with WRITER's feature set?

Yes

Did WRITER live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of WRITER go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy WRITER again?

Yes

It is very easy to navigate, build, and contextually meld your agent into whatever you like. As long as you know how their back-end no-coding platform works, it becomes a breeze to create bespoke content that actually matters, and makes sense. We've done this with multiple agents and as I call it, "sub-functions". There's a lot more potential the agents can do, all you need to know is to just learn the process.

Comments

More Reviews of WRITER

  1. Home
  2. AI Agent Builder Software
  3. WRITER Reviews
  4. User Review of WRITER