TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Coveo Relevance Cloud vs. IBM Watson Explorer

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Coveo Relevance Cloud

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ACoveo is an enterprise search technology which can index data on disparate cloud systems making it easier to retrieve. It has integrated plug-ins for Salesforce.com, Sitecore CEP, and Microsoft Outlook and SharePoint.

    $600

    per month

    IBM Watson Explorer

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AIBM Watson Explorer supports enterprise search with unstructured data analysis, machine learning, and content analysis to improve decision-making, support customer service or serve other business needs.N/A
    Pricing
    Coveo Relevance CloudIBM Watson Explorer
    Editions & Modules
    Base
    $600
    per month
    Pro
    $1,320
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Coveo Relevance CloudIBM Watson Explorer
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Coveo Relevance CloudIBM Watson Explorer
    Small Businesses
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Amazon CloudSearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Amazon CloudSearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Coveo Relevance CloudIBM Watson Explorer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Coveo Relevance CloudIBM Watson Explorer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Coveo
    Coveo Relevance Cloud is a great solution to implement into Salesforce to provide Knowledge-Centered Support, Enhancements to a Customer Community, to provide sales aids, or to complement your customized app in Salesforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The Watson Explorer is great because it potentially replaces a meriad of other low-level analytics products that we would need to use for data analytics and data mining. WEX isn't really suitable much beyond doing text and data analytics and performing machine learning, so if your team doesn't really have a use-case that fits all of these categories, it is worth looking at an alternative.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Coveo
    • Coveo is fast, search results come up quick (though it's not always great).
    • Not much complexity to run.
    • Coveo is implemented within our portal and doesn't require extra steps to use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Free to try - It's possible to use most of the useful features of Watson Explore on their trial/demo accounts.
    • Super well-designed data analytics tool - Most of the tools and features of the explorer are really useful, and truly help you fully understand the depth of any format of textual data.
    • Extensive sources compatibility - WEX can retrieve data from a large range of sources, and the compatibility there is quite good as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Coveo
    • It would be great if Coveo 6 allowed you to rebuild indexes from a certain subtree instead of needing to rebuild the entire tree to see changes. This functionality was added in Coveo 7 and is very useful.
    • In Coveo 6, integration with Sitecore is more difficult than one would expect. This integration is much improved in Coveo 7.
    • I have seen cases where an exception thrown when crawling a specific document will cause the indexing to stop completely. I believe this only happens in implementations using custom faceting but it could be handled more efficiently if the trouble document was skipped and the indexing could continue.
    • Relevancy ranking editor is good but not as powerful as GSA. GSA offers a self-learning scorer which automatically analyzes user behavior and the specific links that users click on for specific queries to fine tune relevance and scoring.
    • We've ran into issues on multiple clients with Sitecore items being indexed multiple times in Sitecore 7 and Coveo 7. The fix Coveo suggested was to upgrade our Sitecore version and Coveo but unfortunately this didn't resolve our issue. After months of testing we were finally able to resolve this by implementing our own CoveoItemCrawler to get around the issue (based on https://developers.coveo.com/display/public/SC201404/Items+in+the+Same+Language+Gets+Indexed+Multiple+Times;jsessionid=3C1A2AE33540E0A0B8BB52BA3A64AF70).
    • Integration with RabbitMQ in Coveo 7 seems error prone. We often see the error "The AMQP operation was interrupted" and on occasion, need to restart the Coveo service to get this operating again. In some extreme cases, we have also had to restart the server because of issues when attempting to restart the Coveo service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Support is just OK, like most of the other IBM Watson products. The setup/integration is really hands-on, but it's also problematic because support later may take a considerable amount of time.
    • UI could still use a little more improvement - part of the administration and sources dashboards are hard to navigate.
    • The Application Builder is a great part of the product, but hard to learn/understand - this is where we needed the most support from IBM and tutorials/documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Coveo
    This question is not applicable to me
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Google Cloud offers a Natural Language product, but it is just an API. This API doesn't offer the useful visualizations of relations, analytics, and graphs that IBM Watson Explorer offers on their interface. For this reason, we chose to go with IBM WEX. For later stages of our production, we decided to use Google's NLP API because we found that it was quick to integrate into production after studying data and developing models using IBM WEX.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Coveo
    • Quick to find things in a massive database when needed.
    • Results need to be more concise - sometimes we spend more time looking for the right file than if we were to just search amongst our own networks instead.
    • Coveo is not always the most useful but does its job when general information is needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Positive - Trial/demo period. This was really useful for us to figure out what features of WEX we liked most and how difficult it would be to integrate WEX into our workflow.
    • Negative - On-boarding was long and almost always requires support from IBM support, unlike most other products this advanced.
    • Positive - WEX replaced a large selection of alternative products we would have to use for the same functionality, and having all of that function in one place was definitely helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots