Ericom Security by Cradlepoint vs. Netskope Private Access vs. Zentry Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Ericom Security and Cradlepoint, part of Ericsson, are expanding the scope and impact of zero trust security services to protect organizations from advanced threats. Ericom’s flagship Security Service Edge (SSE) cloud platform leverages remote browser isolation, application isolation, microsegmentation, and virtualization technologies.N/A
Netskope Private Access
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
Zentry Security
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Zentry, headquartered in Milpitas, provides next-generation secure access solutions to improve security, productivity, visibility, and usability. Zentry empowers modern enterprises by delivering Zero Trust secure access from any device to any application or resource located on-premise or in the cloud.N/A
Pricing
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private AccessZentry Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private AccessZentry Security
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private AccessZentry Security
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
10.0
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Zentry Security
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
7.5
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Zentry Security
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
6.8
4 Ratings
14% below category average
Zentry Security
-
Ratings
Network Analytics00 Ratings7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
7.8
4 Ratings
9% below category average
Zentry Security
-
Ratings
Continuous Verification00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private AccessZentry Security
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private AccessZentry Security
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private AccessZentry Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
Read full review
Zentry Security
It's really fast to connect to internal resources and assests. It's just flawless. You just log in and you will get access. Its major focus on ease of use reduces the amount of time spent on maintaining remote access while decreasing costs related to providing access services. The user experience is fantastic
Read full review
Pros
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
  • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
  • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
  • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
Cons
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
  • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
The process was smooth and well managed.
There was probably good technical coordination and support.
There were only minor details that could be improved.
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cradlepoint
No answers on this topic
Netskope
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
Read full review
Zentry Security
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots